Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Search representations

Results for Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Summary of the Greater Cambridge Local Plan

Representation ID: 202817

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

We are very supportive of the proposed themes and strongly support the high aspirations of this proposed local plan including the policies on Climate, biodiversity, water management, well being and social inclusion, green spaces, jobs, homes and infrastructure.

Full text:

We are very supportive of the proposed themes and strongly support the high aspirations of this proposed local plan including the policies on Climate, biodiversity, water management, well being and social inclusion, green spaces, jobs, homes and infrastructure.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

About the Plan

Representation ID: 202818

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

We are supportive of the processes detailed in this section.

Full text:

We are supportive of the processes detailed in this section.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Development strategy

Representation ID: 202820

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

We welcome this vision document with its focus on new sustainable sites on active travel routes. We note the key importance of infrastructure coming forward in time to support new communities and being rigorously enforced.

Full text:

We welcome this vision document with its focus on new sustainable sites on active travel routes. We note the key importance of infrastructure coming forward in time to support new communities and being rigorously enforced.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/DS: Development strategy

Representation ID: 202822

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

We are very supportive of the hierarchy of development as set out in this policy.

Full text:

We are very supportive of the hierarchy of development as set out in this policy.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/MO: Monitoring

Representation ID: 202826

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

Timely provision of infrastructure, usually available before dwellings are occupied, is critical to successful placemaking and should be a priority. Monitoring must be backed up with resourced enforcement if infrastructure is not brought forward as agreed.

Full text:

Timely provision of infrastructure, usually available before dwellings are occupied, is critical to successful placemaking and should be a priority. Monitoring must be backed up with resourced enforcement if infrastructure is not brought forward as agreed.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Cambridge urban area

Representation ID: 202827

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

We support these policies for the city.

Full text:

We support these policies for the city.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/NEC: North East Cambridge

Representation ID: 202830

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

We support this policy but would note that for "iii. Railway (new pedestrian/cycle bridge to Chesterton Fen); " this should be called Fen Road and we would support the safeguarding of land on the NEC site to allow for a future road traffic bridge as well as a bridge for cycles and pedestrians, should Network Rail agree in the future to remove the level crossing and instead put in place a bridge (or tunnel).

Full text:

We support this policy but would note that for "iii. Railway (new pedestrian/cycle bridge to Chesterton Fen); " this should be called Fen Road and we would support the safeguarding of land on the NEC site to allow for a future road traffic bridge as well as a bridge for cycles and pedestrians, should Network Rail agree in the future to remove the level crossing and instead put in place a bridge (or tunnel).

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/C/PPS: Police Station, Parkside

Representation ID: 202832

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

We support this policy but would like to make clearer that development on this site coming forward should enhance and improve on the current building rather than the less onerous suggestion that it does not make it worse. Can the supporting text be updated to make this clearer.

Full text:

We support this policy but would like to make clearer that development on this site coming forward should enhance and improve on the current building rather than the less onerous suggestion that it does not make it worse. Can the supporting text be updated to make this clearer.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/C/SH: 1-33 Stanton House, Christchurch Street

Representation ID: 202834

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

Can the supporting information make clearer that impacts on the existing terraced housing and flats on Christchurch and Napier Streets should be considered.

Full text:

Can the supporting information make clearer that impacts on the existing terraced housing and flats on Christchurch and Napier Streets should be considered.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/C/CJ: Cambridge Junction and Cambridge Leisure, Hills Road

Representation ID: 202835

Received: 29/01/2026

Respondent: Cambridge City Council Liberal Democrat Group

Representation Summary:

Could bullet 1c be revised to ensure that the same amount of equivalent leisure space be retained as follows:

Redevelopment of the existing commercial leisure units (including cinema, bowling alley and food and beverage outlets) must ensure that these or equivalent leisure uses are re-provided at the same level within the development proposals;

Full text:

Could bullet 1c be revised to ensure that the same amount of equivalent leisure space be retained as follows:

Redevelopment of the existing commercial leisure units (including cinema, bowling alley and food and beverage outlets) must ensure that these or equivalent leisure uses are re-provided at the same level within the development proposals;

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.