Chapter 6 Planning policies - Transport policies

Showing comments and forms 1 to 25 of 25

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168640

Received: 06/04/2021

Respondent: Highways England

Representation Summary:

The Neighbourhood Plan has a large focus on sustainability. These polices are likely to be beneficial locally but are outside of the scope of comment by Highways England in relation to the Strategic Road Network. Highways England has no further comment to make on the plan.

Attachments:

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168641

Received: 09/04/2021

Respondent: Waterbeach Charity

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT2

The Waterbeach Charity Trustees supports the concept of a Pedestrian/ Cycle route as outlined in policy WT2.
It does however wish to point out that the buying of private land to achieve this aim would make the project very expensive.
The land within the existing railway boundaries should be the first option.
The buying of Charity land, private gardens, grazing land and agricultural land would no doubt involve compulsory purchase and could make the concept unachievable.
The Charity would have no objections to the use of railway land alongside the railway for the purpose of a cycle way.

Full text:

I wish to comment on behalf of the Waterbeach Charity (registered Charity No 311348) regarding Policy WT2.

The Waterbeach Charity Trustees supports the concept of a Pedestrian/ Cycle route as outlined in policy WT2.
It does however wish to point out that the buying of private land to achieve this aim would make the project very expensive.
The land within the existing railway boundaries should be the first option.
The buying of Charity land, private gardens, grazing land and agricultural land would no doubt involve compulsory purchase and could make the concept unachievable.
The Charity would have no objections to the use of railway land alongside the railway for the purpose of a cycle way.

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168649

Received: 14/04/2021

Respondent: South Cambridgeshire District Council

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT 2 Pedestrian and cycle route from Waterbeach village railway station to relocated railway station

As there is only one part to this policy there is not a need for the ‘1’ within the policy

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168650

Received: 14/04/2021

Respondent: South Cambridgeshire District Council

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT4 - Creating and maintaining sustainable access routes to Waterbeach village primary school.

Map 6.3 – Mention is made in the policy of particular roads which are indicated on Map 6.3. Whilst it is obvious from the key that these roads are those marked in red would it also be useful for the specific roads to be named in the map for those not familiar with Waterbeach?

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168651

Received: 14/04/2021

Respondent: South Cambridgeshire District Council

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT 5 Creating and Maintaining Sustainable Access Routes to Waterbeach New Town schools

• Part 2 of policy: The references to the location of schools and that children should not have to cross primary and secondary roads to get to school are not considered to be practicable or in general conformity with the Local Plan policy SS/6 ‘Waterbeach New Town’ sections 1 and 17 which states that an SPD will be prepared for the new town to establish the broad location of key components of the new town or with the spatial framework diagram which identifies school locations and a primary and secondary road layout.

• We had suggested amendments to part 2 of the policy which have not been included. These amendments are as follows ‘To assist this, as far as practicable, school entrances should not be located beside through roads. Additionally, the new town should be arranged, as far as practicable and in general conformity with the Spatial Framework Diagram included in the Waterbeach Supplementary Planning Document, such that the need for children having to cross primary and secondary roads to attend school is minimised and preferably avoided altogether…… ‘

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168652

Received: 14/04/2021

Respondent: South Cambridgeshire District Council

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT6 Improving road safety in Waterbeach village

Table 6.1 and Policy – There are many roads mentioned in the policy but without a knowledge of the parish it is not possible to know where they are. Map 6.4 does show these hotspots but it is not at a scale that it is easy to read – it would help if it was at A4.

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168653

Received: 14/04/2021

Respondent: South Cambridgeshire District Council

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT 7 – An accessible Village and Town

Part 1b of policy: Query whether the requirement for a bus shuttle service to the new railway station can be justified by appropriate evidence regarding need for the service and viability as is generally required by national planning policy and advice. Reference could be made in the policy to ensuring the provision at the station of suitable and secure mobility scooter parking. The new railway station was granted planning permission without such provision and no evidence has been referenced in respect of the need for such provision or its effect on viability. The station permission expires in January 2023. They will need to commence development by then to keep the permission alive. If the applicant needs to apply again then this policy could come into play.

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168654

Received: 14/04/2021

Respondent: South Cambridgeshire District Council

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT 9 Protecting and enhancing the provision and quality of Waterbeach’s walking routes including the Waterbeach Public Rights of Way network and bridleways

Part 1 – Should the map reference be 6.6 not 6.5?

Support

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168673

Received: 19/04/2021

Respondent: Ely Diocesan Board of Finance

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT1
Refers to Waterbeach Greenway -Phase 1 of route passes EDBF land off Glebe Rd. Funding from GCP for this.
Phase 2 has no funding. Unclear why no development proposed in plan to support delivery of Phase 2. Promoted residential development by EDBF off Glebe Rd could support deliver of Greenway.

Attachments:

Support

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168674

Received: 19/04/2021

Respondent: Ely Diocesan Board of Finance

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT3
Promoted residential development by EDBF off Glebe Rd could support delivery of Waterbeach Greenway route between Denny End Rd and Glebe Rd.

Attachments:

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168675

Received: 19/04/2021

Respondent: Ely Diocesan Board of Finance

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT9
Public footpath crosses EDBF land off Glebe Rd. EDBF is promoting the land at Glebe Rd for residential development through the Greater Cambridge Local Plan process and is committed to retaining footpath through this land - The design and layout of the promoted development will respect and enhance public footpath.

Attachments:

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168686

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Mrs Barbara Brown

Representation Summary:

Concerns about road safety including wishing a 20mph speed limit in the village, double yellow lines to prevent dangerous parking. Concerns that A14 is a dangerous road at Milton Roundabout

Full text:

I wish to put forward a number of comments concerning the above mentioned plan. It is my hope that these comments go forward to the committee.

1) As a resident of this village and a member of this vibrant, friendly community, I wish to highly recommend this accurate and forward thinking view and plan for our village.

Sadly for nearly the last decade, we have felt that we are the forgotten and ignored community.
WPC and the residents of Waterbeach, plus tens of thousands of surrounding local village residents have fought hard to try to contain this over development. Unbelievably there are still NO plans for any infrastructure.

2) Road safety.
What steps will be taken to stop an ever increasing RatRun from the A14 via Horningsea Road speeding into Waterbeach to join the A10 and inevitably this New Town massive development. Traffic in all areas around the A10 will double with this overpopulation.
The Neighbourhood Plan - Restrict traffic in Cody Road to village residents only.
The Neighbourhood Plan -No New Town Traffic entering Waterbeach through Cody Road.

We wish to see a 20 mph speed limit in our village, particularly in the High Street. One way traffic on Greenside ( by White Horse pub) to help make the heart of our village safer from speeding inconsiderate non-resident drivers.
Time limited parking in layby, by pharmacy and post office.

Double yellow lines (safety barriers ) around all junctions in the Preservation Area of the village , especially where there is now inconsiderate and dangerous parking in that area. Many residents have no clear driving view right or left on leaving their street or lane and entering this area because of dangerous parking on both sides of the High Street. It is especially dangerous for pedestrians to cross a very narrow road with cars parked on both sides of the green

The Milton roundabout is still not finished. The merging of traffic from the A14 on an incredible short merging lane, will develop into an accident black spot! Constant lorries exiting A14 will ignore or not see traffic exiting the roundabout, via green traffic lights.
We hear that there are now plans for a new police headquarters to be built next to the Milton park&ride, so we will have to deal with bluelight traffic constantly using this dangerous road.
It is now time for a direct plan to be made and secured for a Bypass from Milton to Ely.

3) Environment. Car Dyke Roman Canal

The importance of preserving this Ancient Monument. This area has huge importance to our village and community, that is why it it is top of the list for preservation on the Neighbourhood plan.

It is a conservation area, an incredible Fenland landscape, massive horizons and a unique place of peace and reflection.
It's ancient hedgerow has a complete biodiversity to protect. Such a diverse numbers of birds , butterfly and insects.
During lockdown this area next to the recreation ground has been a focal part of the village, it has always been a wonderful place for walkers, especially dog walkers and for horse riding. It is a wonderful bridleway. But more important during these difficult times it has brought a special quietness and mental well being to all different age groups, toddlers up to senior citizens. All within walking distance of the village centre. This last part of our south wild fen that must be preserved for children and greatgrandchildren. Once it goes its gone forever.

At one time this area was considered to be one of many crazy areas put forward as part of a Greenway cycling lane for the New Town.

Thousands of cyclists, e scooters etc. using this area as a thoroughfare is totally abhorrent and destructive to this important environment and heritage site.
Waterbeach overwhelmingly voted to have the area adjacent to the railway line as the new Greenway. Council land I believe, flood plain When, if ever there is an upgrade to the A10 there should be a dedicated cycle lane separated from traffic.
Crossing Car Dyke road junction with pedestrian/ traffic lights replicating Denny End/A10 lights for pedestrians and traffic filter lane At the same time slowing speeding A10 traffic and stopping horrendous traffic accidents that still continue too happen on this dangerous poorly marked road . The traffic will actually come to a stop, with the filter lane safely seeing traffic crossing to the opposite lane to head towards Ely.
We have learnt the hard lessons ,about safety since Butt Lane and Denny End have gained multiple traffic lights the roads have become much safer. It is now the turn of Car Dyke road junction that desperately needs upgrading.

Roundabouts they just not up to the job, cars speed and at busy times they block the roundabout so nothing is moving. You see it in Cambridge eveyday.I

Cycles from Milton cycle way will safely enter the village near the Slap Up Pub pathway or onwards to Denny End.

That way we would have 2 safe cycle ways, with the added bonus of reducing the number of cycles on the tow path and improving the environment by the river.

May I also suggest that at these times the area of walkway for residents through Cody Way to New Town , has plenty of attractive natural looking bench's for tired family's but especially pensioners To sit and chat.



4)Travel
We need a secure New Station bus shuttle for residents who usually walk to our own train station for work and pleasure. We are informed that there is now not going to be a multi car park for the new station, so I take it our village roads will be used as a free car park for passengers. Especially Bannold Road.
RLW were given planning permission for this development because they Bragged that they would totally fund the New station out of their combined huge profits. Now we are informed that this is not happening and now we, the council tax payers are funding this unwanted station. Is this Tory government aware of these changes. We take it that is why no plans for a upgrade or bypass far the A10 or Waterbeach is even forseen in the future.

We have a perfect upgraded station in our village at Station Road, even full crossing barriers, to be updated.
Any sensible owner of that line would keep it open and maintained, in case of emergency ( sadly many have happened on this line exactly where the new station is planned ) passengers having to leave the train many times each year at Waterbeach and catch buses to further their journey +. Emergency services attending victims Thousands of villagers would still like to have a limited off peak service, perhaps twice a day or weekly and a limited weekend timetable from out convenient station. Otherwise many will no longer use either stations, instead traveling by car, bus, or use the much quicker Milton Park&Ride ( cheaper)

Where all the residents of this New Town are going to park all their many cars is a complete mystery to us , we are told (No plans are ever displayed) that no garage or parking is allowed next to their homes. Because everyone will be walking & cycling everywhere, whatever the weather. So one can imagine vast car parks dotted around this development, probably overlooking our village.

Thank you for reading this and passing on to committee.

Attachments:

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168688

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Mrs Barbara Brown

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT2
We need a secure New Station bus shuttle for residents who usually walk to our own train station for work and pleasure.

Full text:

I wish to put forward a number of comments concerning the above mentioned plan. It is my hope that these comments go forward to the committee.

1) As a resident of this village and a member of this vibrant, friendly community, I wish to highly recommend this accurate and forward thinking view and plan for our village.

Sadly for nearly the last decade, we have felt that we are the forgotten and ignored community.
WPC and the residents of Waterbeach, plus tens of thousands of surrounding local village residents have fought hard to try to contain this over development. Unbelievably there are still NO plans for any infrastructure.

2) Road safety.
What steps will be taken to stop an ever increasing RatRun from the A14 via Horningsea Road speeding into Waterbeach to join the A10 and inevitably this New Town massive development. Traffic in all areas around the A10 will double with this overpopulation.
The Neighbourhood Plan - Restrict traffic in Cody Road to village residents only.
The Neighbourhood Plan -No New Town Traffic entering Waterbeach through Cody Road.

We wish to see a 20 mph speed limit in our village, particularly in the High Street. One way traffic on Greenside ( by White Horse pub) to help make the heart of our village safer from speeding inconsiderate non-resident drivers.
Time limited parking in layby, by pharmacy and post office.

Double yellow lines (safety barriers ) around all junctions in the Preservation Area of the village , especially where there is now inconsiderate and dangerous parking in that area. Many residents have no clear driving view right or left on leaving their street or lane and entering this area because of dangerous parking on both sides of the High Street. It is especially dangerous for pedestrians to cross a very narrow road with cars parked on both sides of the green

The Milton roundabout is still not finished. The merging of traffic from the A14 on an incredible short merging lane, will develop into an accident black spot! Constant lorries exiting A14 will ignore or not see traffic exiting the roundabout, via green traffic lights.
We hear that there are now plans for a new police headquarters to be built next to the Milton park&ride, so we will have to deal with bluelight traffic constantly using this dangerous road.
It is now time for a direct plan to be made and secured for a Bypass from Milton to Ely.

3) Environment. Car Dyke Roman Canal

The importance of preserving this Ancient Monument. This area has huge importance to our village and community, that is why it it is top of the list for preservation on the Neighbourhood plan.

It is a conservation area, an incredible Fenland landscape, massive horizons and a unique place of peace and reflection.
It's ancient hedgerow has a complete biodiversity to protect. Such a diverse numbers of birds , butterfly and insects.
During lockdown this area next to the recreation ground has been a focal part of the village, it has always been a wonderful place for walkers, especially dog walkers and for horse riding. It is a wonderful bridleway. But more important during these difficult times it has brought a special quietness and mental well being to all different age groups, toddlers up to senior citizens. All within walking distance of the village centre. This last part of our south wild fen that must be preserved for children and greatgrandchildren. Once it goes its gone forever.

At one time this area was considered to be one of many crazy areas put forward as part of a Greenway cycling lane for the New Town.

Thousands of cyclists, e scooters etc. using this area as a thoroughfare is totally abhorrent and destructive to this important environment and heritage site.
Waterbeach overwhelmingly voted to have the area adjacent to the railway line as the new Greenway. Council land I believe, flood plain When, if ever there is an upgrade to the A10 there should be a dedicated cycle lane separated from traffic.
Crossing Car Dyke road junction with pedestrian/ traffic lights replicating Denny End/A10 lights for pedestrians and traffic filter lane At the same time slowing speeding A10 traffic and stopping horrendous traffic accidents that still continue too happen on this dangerous poorly marked road . The traffic will actually come to a stop, with the filter lane safely seeing traffic crossing to the opposite lane to head towards Ely.
We have learnt the hard lessons ,about safety since Butt Lane and Denny End have gained multiple traffic lights the roads have become much safer. It is now the turn of Car Dyke road junction that desperately needs upgrading.

Roundabouts they just not up to the job, cars speed and at busy times they block the roundabout so nothing is moving. You see it in Cambridge eveyday.I

Cycles from Milton cycle way will safely enter the village near the Slap Up Pub pathway or onwards to Denny End.

That way we would have 2 safe cycle ways, with the added bonus of reducing the number of cycles on the tow path and improving the environment by the river.

May I also suggest that at these times the area of walkway for residents through Cody Way to New Town , has plenty of attractive natural looking bench's for tired family's but especially pensioners To sit and chat.



4)Travel
We need a secure New Station bus shuttle for residents who usually walk to our own train station for work and pleasure. We are informed that there is now not going to be a multi car park for the new station, so I take it our village roads will be used as a free car park for passengers. Especially Bannold Road.
RLW were given planning permission for this development because they Bragged that they would totally fund the New station out of their combined huge profits. Now we are informed that this is not happening and now we, the council tax payers are funding this unwanted station. Is this Tory government aware of these changes. We take it that is why no plans for a upgrade or bypass far the A10 or Waterbeach is even forseen in the future.

We have a perfect upgraded station in our village at Station Road, even full crossing barriers, to be updated.
Any sensible owner of that line would keep it open and maintained, in case of emergency ( sadly many have happened on this line exactly where the new station is planned ) passengers having to leave the train many times each year at Waterbeach and catch buses to further their journey +. Emergency services attending victims Thousands of villagers would still like to have a limited off peak service, perhaps twice a day or weekly and a limited weekend timetable from out convenient station. Otherwise many will no longer use either stations, instead traveling by car, bus, or use the much quicker Milton Park&Ride ( cheaper)

Where all the residents of this New Town are going to park all their many cars is a complete mystery to us , we are told (No plans are ever displayed) that no garage or parking is allowed next to their homes. Because everyone will be walking & cycling everywhere, whatever the weather. So one can imagine vast car parks dotted around this development, probably overlooking our village.

Thank you for reading this and passing on to committee.

Attachments:

Support

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168692

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT1
It is important that the Neighbourhood Plan supports the provision of new pedestrian and cycle linkages as well as enhancing those that already exist to encourage sustainable modes of accessing new services. Delivery of the Bannold Road site will be able to provide new access opportunities northwards towards the Waterbeach New Town.

Support

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168693

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT2
Support is given to the route identified on Map 6.2 as a cycle and pedestrian route linking the village to the relocated railway station. Delivery of the Bannold Road site will be able to provide new access opportunities northwards towards the Waterbeach New Town.

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168694

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT5
Support is given to maintaining sustainable access routes to Waterbeach New Town Schools. These linkages should be for pedestrians and cycle use in its efforts to encourage a modal shift away from the private car.

Object

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168695

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT8
It is considered that this policy as currently drafted is overly prescriptive in terms of the mitigation measures identified. This could negatively affect the viable delivery of sustainable development

Support

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168696

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT9
Support is given to this policy in particular in terms of improved linkages to the public rights of way network within Waterbeach.

Object

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168704

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: RLW Estates

Agent: Boyer Planning

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT1
Addition of sub-paragraph d: “a direct motorised route for public transport vehicles only from Waterbeach village to Waterbeach New Town” is welcomed in acknowledging the ability for direct public transport connections. Reference to segregation should however be removed, and instead made to prioritising non-motorised users (alongside public transport). It should also be acknowledged that the station full planning permission secures access from the village to the relocated station, allowing for pedestrian, cycle, public transport and motorised private vehicle connection, with scope for up to 50 dwellings to be served by the consented station access road (once the A10 access is in place).

Attachments:

Object

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168705

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: RLW Estates

Agent: Boyer Planning

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT4
It should be noted that the planning permission for relocation of the station utilises parts of these routes for village access to the new station, including approved highway works, and that a financial contribution to further works along Way Lane and St Andrews Hill is also secured in association with this planning permission, and could be used to implement such pedestrian and cycle prioritisation measures.
Extension of the area of walking to school routes shown within the associated plan requires further justification, having particular regard to the longer sections of Denny End Road and Bannold Road now included.

Attachments:

Object

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168706

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: RLW Estates

Agent: Boyer Planning

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT5
The overarching objective of providing safe and attractive walking and cycling routes to schools is supported. It is welcomed that some revisions to this policy have been made, in respect of avoiding the need for children having to cross primary and secondary roads to attend school being “minimised”, although it is considered that elements of this policy remain too restrictive, including reference to “not locating school entrances on through routes”. These requirements should be removed, and reference made to the need to devise an appropriate design response for each school site.

Attachments:

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168713

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Cambridgeshire Local Access Forum

Representation Summary:

Cambridgeshire LAF welcomes opportunity to provide input into Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan and how it might be revised and improved to better reflect existing and potential future use of the non-motorised transport network across Parish of Waterbeach.
Recognise that it's a very comprehensive plan, with a lot of concern for biodiversity, historical sites, and conservation. Pleased to see and support policies that aim to protect, enhance and develop the rights of way network providing a network of routes to promote walking, cycling and riding and to point out that circular routes, or routes that link with others, are particularly recommended.
We have the following specific points to make about the plan:
1. Footpaths need to be safe and the footpath at the exit from Car Dyke Road on to the A10 isn't (a baby was killed there recently, and mother is still in hospital).
2. We have concerns about the route of the proposed busway out from Cambridge needing to have houses demolished.

Attachments:

Object

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168714

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Urban & Civic

Agent: DAVID LOCK ASSOCIATES

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT1
Whilst Map 6.1 accompanying Policy WT1 [now WAT 1] has been modified (Consultation Statement change Ref WT1-6, pg. 120), the alignment still does not reflect that illustrated within the SPD and through the plans accompanying the Outline and Reserve Matters Approval for Key Phase 1 of the Barracks and Airfield Redevelopment.

The text supporting the recommended change in the Consultation Statement indicates that the map has been amended:

“…so that the indicative route illustrates more clearly the indicative route set out in the Waterbeach New Town SPD. Also clarify on the map the route of the new pedestrian access to Denny Abbey along the causeway”.

The route shown does not however reflect the alignment of the ‘Causeway Link’ shown on Figure 31 Indicative Framework Plan of the SPD. The route shown on Map 6.1 reflects the alignment of a primary movement and public transport route, shown on SPD Figure 31.
Map showing this part of submission.
This should be corrected, so the policy documents are consistent and reflect the planning approval.

Attachments:

Object

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168715

Received: 20/04/2021

Respondent: Urban & Civic

Agent: DAVID LOCK ASSOCIATES

Representation Summary:

Policy WAT1
Policy amended from Reg 14. This change (Consultation Statement change ref WT1-1, pg.66) has been made in response to a representation which indicated that greater priority should be given to non-motorised users and public transport rather than non-vehicular users.

The amended text at (c) now lacks clarity, as a link cannot be created without crossing vehicular thoroughfares. This should be made clear.
The text introduced at (d) is not consistent with the now approved Site Access Strategy for the Barracks and Airfield Redevelopment (approved as a condition 10 discharge on Outline Planning Permission (S/0559/17/OL)) and now being implemented.

This Site Access Strategy provides for managed access but does not entirely preclude some access for private vehicles, which is necessary for some existing residential properties within the Barracks area (notably those on Orchard Drive and the Papworth blocks) and for emergency vehicles. The wording at (d) is not consistent with this and should be adjusted to reflect that there is some flexibility in the scheme being implemented.

Attachments:

Comment

Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan - Submission version

Representation ID: 168718

Received: 21/04/2021

Respondent: Network Rail

Representation Summary:

Policy WT2 (Late submission)
Network Rail have recently outlined the potential impacts of proposed developments on level crossings in Waterbeach, most recently provided in the response for planning application S/2075/18/OL dated 28/01/2021. The proposed route from Waterbeach Village train station to the relocated train station partially runs along the railway to the east. Policy WT2 would therefore encourage pedestrians to use the Public Right of Way at Burgess Drove level crossing.

Network Rail would prefer to see the pathway constructed further from the railway to reduce the number of pedestrians, including those using mobility scooters and pushchairs, from using the level crossing.

Attachments: