Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Comment

Representation ID: 210038

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 29) Endurance support this approach in principle. This will require careful consideration through further assessment work and masterplanning.

Comment

Representation ID: 210039

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 30) Endurance support this approach in principle. This will require careful consideration through further assessment work and masterplanning.

Comment

Representation ID: 210040

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 31) Endurance support this approach in principle. This will require careful consideration through further assessment work and masterplanning.

Comment

Representation ID: 210041

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 32) Endurance support this approach in principle. This will require careful consideration through further assessment work and masterplanning.

Comment

Representation ID: 210042

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 33a) Endurance support this approach in principle. This will require careful consideration through further assessment work and masterplanning.

Comment

Representation ID: 210043

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 33b) Endurance support this approach in principle. This will require careful consideration through further assessment work and masterplanning. However, the extent and scale, delivery and management of the Cambourne Forest requires further consideration and clarification. This must be considered in the context of the wider package of greenspace, biodiversity and infrastructure enhancements. Expectations need to be realistic and the Councils must also recognise that as woodland does not positively contribute to BNG calculations, some trade-offs may be required.

Comment

Representation ID: 210044

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 33c) Endurance support and welcome a holistic approach to Cambourne’s environmental, economic, social sustainability. It is important that a balanced approach is taken to prioritising these aspects of sustainability to ensure a successful, vibrant economically viable, attractive and sustainable new settlement is created.

Comment

Representation ID: 210045

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 34) Endurance broadly support the proposed policy approach as currently set out and consider that it establishes appropriate principles for the movement strategy.

However, the policy wording should be adjusted to specifically reference a Vision-led approach for the transport and movement strategy for Cambourne North.

Comment

Representation ID: 210046

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 36) Endurance consider that reference to the delivery of the landbridge being in the early phases of the development should be removed to provide more flexibility. It is considered that further consideration of this requirement is required in terms of how this might work and when it could reasonably be delivered having regard to both placemaking and viability considerations. In any event, it is considered that further flexibility is required as to the nature of this and the timescales for delivery.

Support

Representation ID: 210047

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Endurance Estates

(S/CBN: Part 37) Endurance support the proposed approach in principle, and consider that it is important that the design encourages walking and cycling and makes appropriate provision for active travel throughout both within the settlement itself and through its connections with the existing community, surrounding villages and providing appropriate access to the countryside.