Greater Cambridge Local Plan Issues & Options 2020

Search form responses

Results for Ickleton Parish Council search

New search New search
Form ID: 46743
Respondent: Ickleton Parish Council

New settlements have a tendency to be car dominated.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 46745
Respondent: Ickleton Parish Council

Not likely to be a sustainable option for Infill Villages. Not a lot of scope for growth in Group Villages without changing character significantly, and not likely to be sustainable there either.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 46753
Respondent: Ickleton Parish Council

It is reasonable to look at transport corridors, but there will be a need for close consideration of whether a corridor has or will achieve sufficient capacity. For instance, a railway line may not be able to increase the number of services, or passengers carried, or its stations may not be capable of having adequate facilities, to cope with planned development. There is also the risk that many South Cambridgeshire locations will be required to host large-scale car parks for the benefit of the City of Cambridge. Existing settlements may see few benefits from these, and indeed they may well give rise to more traffic through villages on the way to park and ride or travel hub sites.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 46755
Respondent: Ickleton Parish Council

Village categories and the hierarchy of settlements are concepts that are supported. They provide a considerable level of certainty on planning issues. They, or something very like them, should be retained in the new Local Plan.

No uploaded files for public display

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.