Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Search representations

Results for Wysing Arts Centre search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Summary of the Greater Cambridge Local Plan

Representation ID: 204867

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

Wysing Arts Centre asks that Cultural Infrastructure is protected and enhanced, as a strategic civic asset; Create Cambridge is embedded in delivery, governance and phasing; artists are involved in masterplanning (RIBA Stage 2-3); Culture is treated as core infrastructure; genuinely affordable cultural production space is required (e.g. peppercorn, with rental charges well-below market rates and established based on evidence, ie Wysing Arts Centre’s research on affordable artist studios); rehearsal, making and sole-use studios are prioritised over generic co-working, and that a minimum requirement (e.g., 10% in schemes over 1,000 sqm) is introduced.

Full text:

Wysing Arts Centre asks that Cultural Infrastructure is protected and enhanced, as a strategic civic asset; Create Cambridge is embedded in delivery, governance and phasing; artists are involved in masterplanning (RIBA Stage 2-3); Culture is treated as core infrastructure; genuinely affordable cultural production space is required (e.g. peppercorn, with rental charges well-below market rates and established based on evidence, ie Wysing Arts Centre’s research on affordable artist studios); rehearsal, making and sole-use studios are prioritised over generic co-working, and that a minimum requirement (e.g., 10% in schemes over 1,000 sqm) is introduced.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/C/CJ: Cambridge Junction and Cambridge Leisure, Hills Road

Representation ID: 204892

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

I support Cambridge Junction in asking that (supported by Theatres Trust):
temporary provision for all cultural functions must be secured before any demolition or displacement
reprovision is delivered as an early phase; no gap in provision
any future Junction is at least equivalent in standard and capacity, including audience, back-of-house, technical capability, servicing
long-term operational/financial viability assessed alongside spatial design
delivery governed through a structured process (CJ/Council governance, RIBA stages, shared brief before developer engagement)
Agent of Change applied so residential development doesn’t restrict Junction operations
I cannot support this allocation unless continuity, equivalence and viable delivery mechanisms are secured.

Full text:

I support Cambridge Junction in asking that (supported by Theatres Trust):
temporary provision for all cultural functions must be secured before any demolition or displacement
reprovision is delivered as an early phase; no gap in provision
any future Junction is at least equivalent in standard and capacity, including audience, back-of-house, technical capability, servicing
long-term operational/financial viability assessed alongside spatial design
delivery governed through a structured process (CJ/Council governance, RIBA stages, shared brief before developer engagement)
Agent of Change applied so residential development doesn’t restrict Junction operations
I cannot support this allocation unless continuity, equivalence and viable delivery mechanisms are secured.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy WS/CH: Cultural and creative hubs

Representation ID: 204899

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
operational sustainability (management, revenue, long-term viability) is explicitly required alongside spatial and design briefs
flexibility is embedded to allow culture to evolve over time
stronger links are made to delivery mechanisms, including the Cultural Infrastructure Strategy and partnership models
This ensures cultural hubs are viable, adaptable and resilient.
I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
the Agent of Change principle is explicitly embedded, placing responsibility for mitigation on new residential development, not existing venues
major developments demonstrate equitable access, including late-evening public transport, so hubs serve the wider region, not only immediate residents

Full text:

I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
operational sustainability (management, revenue, long-term viability) is explicitly required alongside spatial and design briefs
flexibility is embedded to allow culture to evolve over time
stronger links are made to delivery mechanisms, including the Cultural Infrastructure Strategy and partnership models
This ensures cultural hubs are viable, adaptable and resilient.
I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
the Agent of Change principle is explicitly embedded, placing responsibility for mitigation on new residential development, not existing venues
major developments demonstrate equitable access, including late-evening public transport, so hubs serve the wider region, not only immediate residents

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy WS/NC: Meeting the needs of new and growing Communities

Representation ID: 204906

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
• cultural infrastructure’s ongoing revenue and organisational capacity needs are recognised, not just physical buildings
• culture is embedded in cross-cutting outcomes (innovation, health, education, community resilience)
• partnership frameworks between councils, cultural organisations and communities are referenced as delivery mechanisms
This aligns community infrastructure with lived cultural use.

Full text:

I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
• cultural infrastructure’s ongoing revenue and organisational capacity needs are recognised, not just physical buildings
• culture is embedded in cross-cutting outcomes (innovation, health, education, community resilience)
• partnership frameworks between councils, cultural organisations and communities are referenced as delivery mechanisms
This aligns community infrastructure with lived cultural use.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Climate Change

Representation ID: 204934

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
• cultural infrastructure’s contribution to climate outcomes (adaptive reuse, shared spaces, walkable places, green energy and biodiversity) is explicitly recognised
• culture is embedded within this chapter, not treated solely as a social outcome
Cultural venues support low-carbon placemaking and should be reflected in climate policy.

Full text:

I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
• cultural infrastructure’s contribution to climate outcomes (adaptive reuse, shared spaces, walkable places, green energy and biodiversity) is explicitly recognised
• culture is embedded within this chapter, not treated solely as a social outcome
Cultural venues support low-carbon placemaking and should be reflected in climate policy.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy J/AW: Affordable workspace and creative industries

Representation ID: 204984

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

Wysing Arts Centre and Create Cambridge asks that:
• “Affordable Office Space” is clearly distinguished from “Cultural Production Space”
• genuinely affordable cultural production space is required (e.g. peppercorn, with rental charges well-below market rates and established based on evidence, ie Wysing Arts Centre’s research on affordable artist studios)
• rehearsal, making and sole-use studios are prioritised over generic co-working
• a minimum requirement (e.g., 10% in schemes over 1,000 sqm) is introduced
This safeguards usable creative space from being diluted.

Full text:

Wysing Arts Centre and Create Cambridge asks that:
• “Affordable Office Space” is clearly distinguished from “Cultural Production Space”
• genuinely affordable cultural production space is required (e.g. peppercorn, with rental charges well-below market rates and established based on evidence, ie Wysing Arts Centre’s research on affordable artist studios)
• rehearsal, making and sole-use studios are prioritised over generic co-working
• a minimum requirement (e.g., 10% in schemes over 1,000 sqm) is introduced
This safeguards usable creative space from being diluted.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy WS/MU: Meanwhile uses during long term redevelopments

Representation ID: 204992

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

Wysing Arts Centre and Create Cambridge asks:
a Meanwhile Strategy is required at validation for Areas of Major Change and large phased developments
strategies set out activation of vacant sites, governance arrangements, exit pathways to permanent provision
cultural/community uses are embedded throughout long construction periods, not only at completion
long-term vacant units are proactively enabled for cultural use; artists involved in shaping terms
clear exit pathways prevent displacement when redevelopment proceeds
creative commons/Creative Land Trust-style models are explored to secure permanent affordable space
Create Cambridge is engaged as a key consultee on delivery models, drawing on national and international precedents

Full text:

Wysing Arts Centre and Create Cambridge asks:
a Meanwhile Strategy is required at validation for Areas of Major Change and large phased developments
strategies set out activation of vacant sites, governance arrangements, exit pathways to permanent provision
cultural/community uses are embedded throughout long construction periods, not only at completion
long-term vacant units are proactively enabled for cultural use; artists involved in shaping terms
clear exit pathways prevent displacement when redevelopment proceeds
creative commons/Creative Land Trust-style models are explored to secure permanent affordable space
Create Cambridge is engaged as a key consultee on delivery models, drawing on national and international precedents

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy GP/QP: Establishing high quality landscape and public realm

Representation ID: 204998

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
• public art and cultural activation link to a Percent for Art initiative or Cultural Infrastructure Levy
• the Public Art SPD is explicitly referenced
• artists are appointed at RIBA Stage 2–3, embedded in masterplanning
• Create Cambridge is engaged as advisor/consultee/co-curator (with communities) in developing plans and strategies for public art and cultural activation
This ensures cultural value is designed in from the outset.

Full text:

I support Create Cambridge in asking that:
• public art and cultural activation link to a Percent for Art initiative or Cultural Infrastructure Levy
• the Public Art SPD is explicitly referenced
• artists are appointed at RIBA Stage 2–3, embedded in masterplanning
• Create Cambridge is engaged as advisor/consultee/co-curator (with communities) in developing plans and strategies for public art and cultural activation
This ensures cultural value is designed in from the outset.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/NEC: North East Cambridge

Representation ID: 205004

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

Wysing Arts Centre and Create Cambridge ask that:
• delivery of a cultural anchor (venue, arts centre or artist studios) is required in Phase 1
• cultural provision is not deferred to later phases, where it is at risk of non-delivery
• Create Cambridge is engaged as an advisor/consultee on plans and proposals for cultural infrastructure as part of new developments
Early cultural infrastructure is essential to avoid dormitory development and support identity, cohesion and liveability.

Full text:

Wysing Arts Centre and Create Cambridge ask that:
• delivery of a cultural anchor (venue, arts centre or artist studios) is required in Phase 1
• cultural provision is not deferred to later phases, where it is at risk of non-delivery
• Create Cambridge is engaged as an advisor/consultee on plans and proposals for cultural infrastructure as part of new developments
Early cultural infrastructure is essential to avoid dormitory development and support identity, cohesion and liveability.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/MO: Monitoring

Representation ID: 205007

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Wysing Arts Centre

Representation Summary:

Wysing Arts Centre and Create Cambridge ask that:
• Creative Industries data is disaggregated from the Cultural Sector in future monitoring
• assumptions about resilience and commercial success are tested separately for cultural infrastructure
• the Create Cambridge Insights Report is included as evidence base
This will ensure that future policies and plans are based on accurate economic diagnosis.

Full text:

Wysing Arts Centre and Create Cambridge ask that:
• Creative Industries data is disaggregated from the Cultural Sector in future monitoring
• assumptions about resilience and commercial success are tested separately for cultural infrastructure
• the Create Cambridge Insights Report is included as evidence base
This will ensure that future policies and plans are based on accurate economic diagnosis.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.