Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Search representations

Results for Swavesey Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy I/ST: Sustainable transport and connectivity

Representation ID: 201972

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The respondent emphasises the need for a focus on the cumulative impact of proposed developments on local infrastructure, particularly regarding traffic volume from HGVs, delivery vehicles, and cars.

Concerns are raised about increased rat-running through villages alongside the A14 due to new developments.

There are worries about the integrity of A14 flyovers, which are reportedly sinking under current traffic loads.

The respondent highlights issues related to HGV parking in villages and around the A14, stating that additional HGV parking is essential for any approved developments.

The cumulative impact of traffic from already consented housing developments, as well as proposed business and warehouse parks, needs to be assessed.

It is recommended that all major development sites provide traffic and transport data on cumulative impacts rather than just site-specific impacts.

Full text:

Swavesey Parish Council believes that more emphasis should be included with regard to the cumulative impact all of the proposed development in an area will have on local infrastructure. In the Swavesey area, this includes:
• Increase in volume of traffic, both HGVs, delivery vehicles and cars (employees).
• Increase in rat-running of vehicles through villages alongside the A14.
• Concerns over integrity of A14 flyovers, which are already sinking under existing traffic flows.
• HGV parking – causing issues and dangers in and around villages and the A14. Additional HGV
parking is vital for any consented development.
• Cumulative impact of increased traffic from already consented housing developments in this area, as well as proposed development including business and warehouse parks is required.

All major development sites should be requested to provide traffic and transport data on cumulative impact, not just site specific impact.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy I/EV: Parking and electric vehicles

Representation ID: 201974

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policy

Full text:

Support the policy

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy I/SD: Servicing and last-mile deliveries

Representation ID: 201976

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

There are strong concerns regarding the cumulative impact of increased traffic on local villages, particularly from HGVs, delivery vehicles, and employee cars.

The respondent highlights an increase in rat-running through villages adjacent to the A14 as a significant issue.

Concerns have been raised about the integrity of A14 flyovers, which are reportedly sinking under current traffic loads.

Issues related to HGV parking in and around villages and the A14 have been noted, with a call for additional HGV parking to support any consented developments.

The cumulative impact of traffic from already consented housing developments, as well as proposed business and warehouse parks, needs to be assessed.

There are concerns regarding the A1307 being used as access to/from a development park, as it was intended for local access to reduce traffic on the A14.

Full text:

Traffic – Strong concerns re cumulative impact on local villages
• Increase in volume of traffic, both HGVs, delivery vehicles and cars (employees).
• Increase in rat-running of vehicles through villages alongside the A14.
• Concerns over integrity of A14 flyovers, which are already sinking under existing traffic flows.
• HGV parking – causing issues and dangers in and around villages and the A14. Additional HGV parking is vital for any consented development.
• Cumulative impact of increased traffic from already consented housing developments in this area, as well as proposed development including business and warehouse parks is required.
A1307 – Local road, concerns over cumulative increase in traffic volume
• A1307 should not be used as an access road to/from a development park. It was provided for local access, to keep local traffic off the A14 and allow a safer route for local residents.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy I/ID: Infrastructure and delivery

Representation ID: 201980

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

There are serious concerns regarding increased flood risk associated with developments in the Swavesey surface water catchment area, particularly due to the existing capacity issues of the drainage system.

The Swavesey drainage system is currently at capacity and is not yet accommodating water from already consented developments in nearby areas such as Cambourne, Bourn and Northstowe.

Large scale developments should implement attenuation basins to manage water flow, especially when Webb’s Hole Sluice closes during high river levels.

Cumulative data on the impact of proposed developments on the Swavesey water system needs to be provided by developers within the catchment area.

Concerns are raised about the potential flood risk when multiple developments release water simultaneously after Webb’s Hole Sluice reopens.

The foul water from proposed sites using Uttons Drove Treatment Works will add to the surface water concerns, increasing flood risk.

Major developments should negotiate S106 contributions for onsite and offsite mitigation to address local flood risk concerns and improve existing infrastructure.

Full text:

Surface and Foul Water – Serious concerns held over increased flood risk and how this would be managed
• Water from development within the Swavesey surface water catchment area, will flow through the Swavesey drainage system to the river, potentially increasing flood risk around the village.
• Swavesey’s drainage system is at capacity now and it is not yet receiving all the water from already consented development at Cambourne, Northstowe, Bourn and other smaller development sites
• Water from large scale development flowing into the Swavesey system needs to be conditioned
for attenuation basins to hold water for up to 4 weeks when Webb’s Hole Sluice, at the river, closes at high river levels.
• Cumulative data showing the effect on the Swavesey Water system needs to be provided by any proposed development site within the Swavesey catchment area.
More developments in this area are providing large attenuation to cope with the winter high water levels, what will happen when they all release water when the Webb’s Hole Sluice gate reopens following a closure?
• All the foul water from proposed sites intending to use Uttons Drove Treatment Works, with outflow treated water into the Swavesey system and onwards to the river. This will be on top of the surface water already mentioned. Providing increased flood risk concern.

Mitigation - S106 contributions
Major developments should ensure that onsite and offsite mitigation, by way of S106 obligations, are provided and negotiated with local parishes, to ensure that local concerns relating particularly to flood risk, can be managed. Improvement works to help prevent increased flood risk and manage existing infrastructure is vital.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy I/CM: Construction management

Representation ID: 201981

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support this policy in full

Full text:

Support this policy in full

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy J/NE: New employment development proposals

Representation ID: 201984

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

We support the policy specifically in relation to: Not supporting proposals for large scale warehousing or distribution centres, which for the purposes of this policy are defined as those premises generally exceeding 9,300 square metres (100,000 square feet) and which serve a wider regional or national function.

Full text:

We support the policy specifically in relation to: Not supporting proposals for large scale warehousing or distribution centres, which for the purposes of this policy are defined as those premises generally exceeding 9,300 square metres (100,000 square feet) and which serve a wider regional or national function.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy CC/WE: Water efficiency in new developments

Representation ID: 201986

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Specifically for non-residential major development sites, water reuse or recycling systems must be provided in the Sustainability Statement.
Reduction of flood risk to the surrounding area, by way of storing and re-using water, is paramount, to help reduce the impact on already at capacity surface water drainage systems.

Full text:

Specifically for non-residential major development sites, water reuse or recycling systems must be provided in the Sustainability Statement.
Reduction of flood risk to the surrounding area, by way of storing and re-using water, is paramount, to help reduce the impact on already at capacity surface water drainage systems.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy CC/IW: Integrated water management, sustainable drainage and water quality

Representation ID: 201989

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

There are serious concerns regarding increased flood risk from developments within the Swavesey surface water catchment area, as the existing drainage system is already at capacity.

Water from large-scale developments should be conditioned to include attenuation basins capable of holding water for up to 4 weeks when the Webb’s Hole Sluice is closed.

Cumulative data on the impact of proposed developments on the Swavesey Water system must be provided, especially regarding the release of water when the Webb’s Hole Sluice reopens.

Concerns are raised about the foul water from proposed sites using Uttons Drove Treatment Works, which will add to the flood risk by discharging treated water into the Swavesey system.

Major developments should negotiate S106 contributions for onsite and offsite mitigation to address local flood risk concerns and improve existing infrastructure.

Full text:

Surface and Foul Water – Serious concerns held over increased flood risk and how this would be managed • Water from development within the Swavesey surface water catchment area, will flow through the Swavesey drainage system to the river, potentially increasing flood risk around the village. • Swavesey’s drainage system is at capacity now and it is not yet receiving all the water from already consented development at Cambourne, Northstowe, Bourn and other smaller development sites • Water from large scale development flowing into the Swavesey system needs to be conditioned for attenuation basins to hold water for up to 4 weeks when Webb’s Hole Sluice, at the river, closes at high river levels. • Cumulative data showing the effect on the Swavesey Water system needs to be provided by any proposed development site within the Swavesey catchment area. More developments in this area are providing large attenuation to cope with the winter high water levels, what will happen when they all release water when the Webb’s Hole Sluice gate reopens following a closure? • All the foul water from proposed sites intending to use Uttons Drove Treatment Works, with outflow treated water into the Swavesey system and onwards to the river. This will be on top of the surface water already mentioned. Providing increased flood risk concern. Mitigation - S106 contributions Major developments should ensure that onsite and offsite mitigation, by way of S106 obligations, are provided and negotiated with local parishes, to ensure that local concerns relating particularly to flood risk, can be managed. Improvement works to help prevent increased flood risk and manage existing infrastructure is vital.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy CC/FM: Managing flood risk

Representation ID: 201994

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The respondent supports the policy in full.

For the Swavesey catchment area, onsite attenuation for new development should be capable of holding water for up to 4 weeks when the Webb's Hole sluice closes to prevent inundation of the drainage system and flood fens.

Site attenuation basins must reopen in a managed manner when the water level in the River Gt Ouse drops and the Webb's Hole sluice opens to avoid overwhelming the drainage system.

The unique drainage system of Swavesey requires careful management.

SCDC Awarded Watercourses should be considered in the overall drainage strategy for Swavesey.

Full text:

Support of this policy in full.
Also to include, for the Swavesey catchment area, that onsite attenuation for new development needs to be able to hold water for up to 4 weeks, when the Webb's Hole sluice on the river closes, to ensure the Swavesey drainage system and flood fens are not inundated when water cannot outflow to the river.
When the water level in the River Gt Ouse drops and Webb's Hole Sluice opens, site attenuation basins need to re-open in a managed and structured way, to ensure the drainage system isn't overwhelmed.
Swavesey is particularly unique with it's drainage system, which needs careful management.
SCDC Awarded Watercourses also impact on the Swavesey system and these need to be considered as part of the overall drainage strategy.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy I/ST: Sustainable transport and connectivity

Representation ID: 202016

Received: 27/01/2026

Respondent: Swavesey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Active Travel provision in rural areas should include equestrian and leisure options alongside cycling and walking for commuting purposes.

Routes connecting villages to new development sites will serve both commuting and leisure needs.

The A14 poses a barrier for non-motorised users, with limited crossing points and unsafe routes leading to them.

Existing roads from villages are often 60mph with heavy traffic and no pavements, making them unsafe for vulnerable users.

Designating new Active Travel links as Public Bridleway would enhance connectivity and safety for local residents.

Existing examples, such as the A1307 roadside Public Bridleway, demonstrate the potential for safe and inclusive Active Travel routes.

Full text:

Active Travel including horseriders - Active Travel provision in a rural area should of course include equestrian and leisure provision as well as cycling and walking for commuting/utility purposes from the outset. The same routes which will link nearby villages to and from prospective new development sites for commuting purposes will be used equally for leisure purposes. The A14 is a barrier between villages north and south of it for vulnerable non-motorised users with few existing crossing points (Swavesey, Bar Hill and Oakington only) and a lack of safe routes out of villages to these crossing points, all of which are adjacent or nearby to proposed new sites. Existing roads out of these villages are mainly 60mph with frequent traffic of all kinds and usually no pavement so are unpleasant, intimidatory and unsafe for vulnerable users having to share these roads with motorised vehicles.
The simple decision of denoting the new Active Travel links to/from these sites and between villages as Public
Bridleway will go a long way to providing much-needed connectivity and safety for all local people. Precedent is
already in place with the A1307 roadside Public Bridleway (tarmac with grass verges) and its bridges over the
A1307/A14. Any new AT routes from these developments would link into this existing provision and supply facility to
the same standard of user inclusion.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.