Draft Greater Cambridge Health Impact Assessment Supplementary Planning Document

Comment

Representation ID: 200375

Received: 24/01/2025

Respondent: University of Cambridge

The objectives of the SPD are supported. However, it is important for decision makers to acknowledge that the planning process (and land use in general) is only one part of the way that people can achieve the “highest level of health and wellbeing”. There are genetic factors, personal choice factors and factors related to service provision that are well outside of the control of the planning process.

While parts of the introductory chapters do acknowledge these other factors, and the checklist itself is focused on these matters, it is important for decision makers to see clearer guidance on the remit of HIAs (and limitations to them) in the introductory chapters.

Comment

Representation ID: 200376

Received: 24/01/2025

Respondent: University of Cambridge

The HIA should not need to replicate anything that is controlled by building regulations or assessed in detail as part of the EIA.

There is no reference to the distinction between outline and detailed planning applications – where the nature and scope of an HIA needs to be quite different.

We would ask for additional clarity on the thresholds included in the SPD. For development of over 100 homes a Rapid HIA should be sufficient, including a steering group with the LPA who will have very good knowledge of local issues already. We do not think a Full HIA it is realistic for development of this scale.

Comment

Representation ID: 200377

Received: 24/01/2025

Respondent: University of Cambridge

The HIA Checklist includes many requirements that exist as planning policies whether or not an HIA is required and we would encourage a consideration as to whether these matters need to be addressed in an HIA.