Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for Stapleford Parish Council search
New searchComment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Climate change
Representation ID: 57521
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
The unique and protected Chalk Hills and river systems are a serious concern with regards to protection and management and any large scale development will exacerbate these difficult issues. Stapleford has suffered flooding and the river run dry. A length of cycle/footpath alongside the A1301 was replaced when the river broke its banks causing flooding on the the A1301, putting cyclists in danger. Water management is a key local concern. The village has declared a Climate Emergency and we are embracing climate change policies in all our decisions. Building on the Green Belt meets does not meet our policy statements.
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Biodiversity and green spaces
Representation ID: 57525
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
Cambridge is reknowned for its green spaces, open agricultural land, the unique landscape of the Magog Hills, its chalk hills and the Wandlebury Historic Site. The proposed Green Belt erosion between the City and Stapleford Parish will ultimately destroying our village status. Your policy is to enhance biodiversity, geodiversity, river corridors and protect open spaces. Building in open spaces in the Green Belt cannot meet these policies. We agree that tree cover is an important issue but Chalk Hills will not support the planting of numerous trees in our area. Wandlebury have a strong policy for tree planting and maintenance.
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Wellbeing and inclusion
Representation ID: 57530
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
100 houses on the outside edge of a small village does not need community, sports and leisure facilities. However existing facilities would be stretched beyond their limits, especially the two local primary schools and Granta Medical Practice. Residents would therefore need to use their cars to access both these facilities elsewhere. Building 100 houses does not build community and certainly, in this case, will not meet the needs of this community in terms of future expansion. We need infill brown sites to be developed with truly affordable housing, not add on cluster development which cannot bring inclusion or develop wellbeing
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Great places
Representation ID: 57532
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
The Stapleford proposed site destroys the Landscape Character of the village.
It goes totally against the statement for protection and enhancement of the Green Belt.
It does not establish the conservation of high quality landscape or the public realm
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Homes
Representation ID: 57545
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
The proposed development on Mingle Lane Stapleford would severely impact the Green Belt, Magog Hills, Wandlebury, and the rural landscape with little or no benefit to local people. The land proposed for development is meadowland. Landscape and biodiversity cannot be replaced once lost. The coalescence of villages with Cambridge cannot be condoned. Infrastructure is insufficient to support more development. There are massive developments proposed in the East, West and CBC areas which begs the question as to the need for this small development of 100 houses on green belt land, totally separated from these other developments.
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Jobs
Representation ID: 57547
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
Where the proposal is to develop prime agricultural land in the green belt it cannot be deemed to be ‘protecting the best agricultural land or supporting the rural economy.
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Infrastructure
Representation ID: 57549
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
The Stapleford site is being promoted on ‘good transport links’ with one train per hour from the Great Shelford Station! The village is within a ten minute cycle distance from all the local Campus sites. The connectivity problems arise from the A1307 (which connects these sites) and the lack of rail route from Haverhill where many employees live due to the affordable housing there. Reopening the Haverhill train line would remove much of the traffic from the A1307 and alleviate the traffic problems we have through the village
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Sustainability Appraisal
Representation ID: 57550
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
These documents are very sound. The problem is that many of the above policies don’t fully meet these documents statements.
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
H/AH: Affordable housing
Representation ID: 57554
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
Truly affordable homes are needed. However, developers have mechanisms which allow them to negotiate down the affordable element of a development, and they can negotiate for designated affordable homes to be market price. This must be prevented. Affordable dwellings need to go to people with a local connection, and should be protected as affordable for future generations which builds community. Affordability cannot be allowed to overturn Green Belt legislation, or landscape impact policies, or build on high quality agricultural land. Planning is required, not development management.
Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
S/RSC: Village allocations in the rural southern cluster
Representation ID: 57561
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Stapleford Parish Council
S/RSC/HW Land between Hinton Way and Mingle Lane, Great Shelford
The proposed Mingle Lane, Stapleford site is on Green Belt land, which is also meadowland. It is not considered to meet the exceptional criteria for development on Green Belt. It will impact the unique landscape. It will destroy biodiversity. It will increase road congestion on all routes. It will increase coalescence with Cambridge and Gt Shelford. The land mass proposed is far greater than the proposed 100 dwellings. The 40% affordability element can be negotiated down by the developer. Local impact will be great when compared to the supposed benefit of development, particularly loss of Green Belt, biodiversity, and landscape