4.5

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Support

Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD

Representation ID: 31733

Received: 01/10/2017

Respondent: St Andrew's Church

Representation Summary:

Again, we are looking for imaginative thinking here. At the moment the proposals are not suggesting great connectivity between this development and existing Cherry Hinton. Current residents need a reason to go into the new development, and access by car as well as cycle and foot. THere needs to be parking for visitors to the new community. There needs to be enough parking for the cars generated by the new housing, so that they don't overflow into existing streets forcing permit systems which begin to erode connectivity. Above all Coldham's Lane needs a bike/pedestrian lane.

Full text:

Again, we are looking for imaginative thinking here. At the moment the proposals are not suggesting great connectivity between this development and existing Cherry Hinton. Current residents need a reason to go into the new development, and access by car as well as cycle and foot. THere needs to be parking for visitors to the new community. There needs to be enough parking for the cars generated by the new housing, so that they don't overflow into existing streets forcing permit systems which begin to erode connectivity. Above all Coldham's Lane needs a bike/pedestrian lane.

Object

Land North of Cherry Hinton SPD

Representation ID: 31745

Received: 02/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Keith Cowley

Representation Summary:

Can only work if cheap and efficient public transport is provided to tempt residents away from their cars. The existing services will not be in any way adequate to achieve this.

Full text:

Can only work if cheap and efficient public transport is provided to tempt residents away from their cars. The existing services will not be in any way adequate to achieve this.