Question 32
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29284
Received: 10/12/2014
Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited
Sensible, but lets not forget SMEs.
Sensible, but lets not forget SMEs.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29521
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Hazel Smith
Residential flats will ensure the area is not dead in the evenings.
Residential flats will ensure the area is not dead in the evenings.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29573
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
Provided it is tastefully done
Provided it is tastefully done
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29616
Received: 27/01/2015
Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam
Where there is residential development there must also be local shops and community facilities, including a doctor's surgery
Where there is residential development there must also be local shops and community facilities, including a doctor's surgery
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29689
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
Brookgate agree that a new local centre is essential to the creation of a vibrant, mixed use neighbourhood as set out in the proposed CNFE vision. It will act as both a focal point and a social hub for the CNFE area. There should be flexibility regarding its location along the Boulevard, positioning it around the station would ensure a highly accessible and sustainable location. It should include new retail provision to meet local needs and complement nearby centres as set out in objective 4 of the proposed development objectives. Employment and residential uses could be provided on upper floors.
Brookgate agree that a new local centre is essential to the creation of a vibrant, mixed use neighbourhood as set out in the proposed CNFE vision. It will act as both a focal point and a social hub for the CNFE area. There should be flexibility regarding its location along the Boulevard, positioning it around the station would ensure a highly accessible and sustainable location. It should include new retail provision to meet local needs and complement nearby centres as set out in objective 4 of the proposed development objectives. Employment and residential uses could be provided on upper floors.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29791
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
In principle it is correct that a new local centre should be created to support the needs of a local community, however, it is not possible to make any informed decision on quantum, uses or location until the deliverability of the AAP area is further advanced.
In principle it is correct that a new local centre should be created to support the needs of a local community, however, it is not possible to make any informed decision on quantum, uses or location until the deliverability of the AAP area is further advanced.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29918
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
Proposed new local centre in Options 2-4 is supported in principle. It is noted that it is proposed that this includes a residential element and other elements which will be used by people, and in Option 2 the local centre appears to lie partially within the odour zone which is not suitable for such a use. The location of the local centre must have regard to development existing or proposed in the locality, so that potential amenity issues arising from proximity to the Water Recycling Centre, waste management uses, and railheads are avoided and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
The proposed new local centre in Options 2-4 is supported in principle. However, it is noted that it is proposed that this include a residential element and other elements which will be used by people, and in Option 2 the local centre appears to lie partially within the odour zone which is not suitable for such a use. The location of the local centre must have regard to other development existing or proposed in the locality, so that potential amenity issues arising for example from proximity to the Water Recycling Centre, waste management uses, and the railheads are avoided and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30033
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Providing sufficient services for immediate needs of community near station most suitable location to ensure maximum use.
Providing sufficient services for immediate needs of community near station most suitable location to ensure maximum use.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30188
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
At this stage the approach is too rigid and could need adaptation if more residential is included. Thus location and form needs to be less specific.
At this stage the approach is too rigid and could need adaptation if more residential is included. Thus location and form needs to be less specific.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30285
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited
Agent: Carter Jonas
Turnstone consider that any uses proposed on the CNFE site should be totally complementary to employment uses. Retail facilities of an appropriate scale would be an acceptable use, subject to commercial viability.
Turnstone consider that any uses proposed on the CNFE site should be totally complementary to employment uses. Retail facilities of an appropriate scale would be an acceptable use, subject to commercial viability.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30334
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
No comment.
No comment.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30402
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Residential flats will ensure the area is not dead in the evenings.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30481
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd
TCE support the approach set out for the new local centre and welcome the proposals to include retail and other uses within this location. These new uses should be located in one area (as part of the local centre) so as not to dilute the existing office and employment functions of the CNFE area.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30519
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridge City Council
Support. The provision of such facilities together is likely to be more sustainable and viable.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30603
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
Yes.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.