Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Representation ID: 60584

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Countryside Properties - Fen Ditton site

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

The content of this policy is supported. It is positive that the policy references the Greater Cambridge Landscape Character Assessment as a clear point of reference in responding to this policy. In considering the suitability of sites for development it will be important that consideration is given to any other known changes in landscape character as a result of development such as infrastructure improvements or other committed developments.
A slight amendment is suggested to the wording to provide flexibility. The third bullet point is suggested to be amended to state that developments will be required to ‘retain and enhance landscape features within new developments that positively contribute to the quality and character of the area, wherever possible’. The wording as it currently stands suggests that any landscape features on sites should be retained and enhanced, whereas the proposed amendment ensures that features of limited value may be appropriately removed. The proposed wording is consistent with that currently set out under Policy GP/QP.
It is also noted that the policy makes reference to the need for protecting ‘important green gaps’. The only green gap referenced is Longstanton and Northstowe and therefore it is assumed the policy should be updated to refer to a singular gap.

Full text:

The content of this policy is supported by Countryside in order to address landscape character through development. The proposed development at Fen Ditton will meet the aspirations of the policy and will retain and enhance landscape features within the development as well as creating new features as part of an enhanced landscape framework. It is also positive that the policy references the Greater Cambridge Landscape Character Assessment as a clear point of reference in responding to this policy. In considering the suitability of sites for development it will be important that consideration is given to any other known changes in landscape character as a result of development such as infrastructure improvements or other committed developments.
A slight amendment is suggested to the wording to again provide flexibility. The third bullet point is suggested to be amended to state that developments will be required to ‘retain and enhance landscape features within new developments that positively contribute to the quality and character of the area, wherever possible’. The wording as it currently stands suggests that any landscape features on sites should be retained and enhanced, whereas the proposed amendment ensures that features of limited value may be appropriately removed, or indeed where features of value may need to be removed, for example to facilitate access. The proposed wording is consistent with that currently set out under Policy GP/QP.
It is also noted that the policy makes reference to the need for protecting ‘important green gaps’. The only green gap referenced is Longstanton and Northstowe and therefore it is assumed the policy should be updated to refer to a singular gap.