Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Representation ID: 60307

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Representation Summary:

Duty to Cooperate
Gladman are supportive of the two Councils working jointly to prepare the new Local Plan for Greater Cambridge, as this both aligns with the policy commitment in the existing Local Plans and allows for strategic matters which cross between the two LPAs to be considered comprehensively in a joined-up manner. Notwithstanding this, it still remains of critical importance for the two Councils to work alongside the other Cambridgeshire authorities to ensure that any wider cross boundary issues are addressed.
As demonstrated through the outcome of other examinations, if a Council fails to satisfactorily discharge its DtC a Planning Inspector must recommend non-adoption of the Plan. This cannot be rectified through modifications.

Full text:

Duty to Cooperate
The Duty to Cooperate (DtC) is a legal requirement established through section 33(A) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, as amended by Section 110 of the Localism Act. The DtC requires local planning authorities to engage constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis with neighbouring authorities on cross-boundary strategic issues through the process of ongoing engagement and collaboration.
The revised Framework introduced a number of significant changes to how local planning authorities are expected to cooperate including the preparation of Statement(s) of Common Ground (SoCG) which are required to demonstrate that a plan is based on effective cooperation and has been based on agreements made by neighbouring authorities where cross boundary strategic issues are likely to exist. Planning guidance sets out that local planning authorities should produce, maintain, and update one or more SoCGs, throughout the plan making process. The SoCG(s) should provide a written record of the progress made by the strategic planning authorities during the process of planning for strategic cross-boundary matters and will need to demonstrate the measures local authorities have taken to ensure cross boundary matters have been considered and what actions are required to ensure issues are proactively dealt with, such as unmet housing needs.
Gladman are supportive of the two Councils working jointly to prepare the new Local Plan for Greater Cambridge, as this both aligns with the policy commitment in the existing Local Plans and allows for strategic matters which cross between the two LPAs to be considered comprehensively in a joined-up manner. Notwithstanding this, it still remains of critical importance for Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire to work alongside the other Cambridgeshire authorities to ensure that any wider cross boundary issues are addressed. It may be the case that these need to be addressed through SOCGs with the other LPAs.
As demonstrated through the outcome of the Coventry, Mid Sussex, Castle Point and St Albans examinations, if a Council fails to satisfactorily discharge its DtC a Planning Inspector must recommend non-adoption of the Plan. This cannot be rectified through modifications.