Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 59269
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Sphere25
The exclusion of a draft allocation for CSPN at this stage is regrettable and it is TCC’s view that following a review of both the supporting evidence bases for the JLP and North East Cambridge Action Plan (NECAAP), that neither documents current aims are deliverable without CSPN being allocated.
The exclusion of a draft allocation for CSPN at this stage is regrettable and it is TCC’s view that following a review of both the supporting evidence bases for the JLP and North East Cambridge Action Plan (NECAAP), that neither documents current aims are deliverable without CSPN being allocated.
Procedurally, the evidence base for Policy S/NEC was published on the 22nd November, only allowing 3 weeks for responses.
Deliverability of Policy NEC AAP and the impact on adopted Policy E/1.
Concerns regarding the jobs growth proposed, and evidence base.
Deliverability of S/NEC without a strategic intervention to address unresolved transport concerns.
The open space deficit, and deliverability of S/NEC without the strategic scale public formal and informal open space proposed at CSPN.
Out of date and / or inaccurate evidence base in support of the policy.