Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 58625
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Vistry Group and RH Topham & Sons Ltd
Agent: Roebuck Land and Planning Ltd
The settlement hierarchy methodology and tiers are generally supported. The recognition of Cambridge city at the top followed by the existing new settlements/towns including Cambourne is logical. However, decisions on the status of specific settlements within the remaining categories should be paused until the spatial strategy has been finalised.
The settlement hierarchy methodology and tiers are generally supported. The recognition of Cambridge city at the top followed by the existing new settlements/towns including Cambourne is logical. However, decisions on the status of specific settlements within the remaining categories should be paused until the spatial strategy has been finalised. For example, the identification of any new or expanded settlements in the next stage of plan-making may alter the status of other villages.
For example, a new Garden Village or expanded settlement could take on a different role, potentially as a rural Centre or a Minor Rural Centre. Any new settlement should not solely be assumed to be within the same category or status as the three proposed ‘new towns’ of Northstowe, Waterbeach and Cambourne.