Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Representation ID: 58606

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Artisan (UK) Projects Ltd

Agent: Armstrong Rigg Planning

Representation Summary:

We are concerned that the proposed development strategy ignores the need for suitable levels of growth to come forwards in the rural areas. The proposed settlement boundary policy compounds this issue by restricting growth outside settlement boundaries. There is a need for housing growth in villages during the plan period and we consider that growth should be allocated to all settlements or a flexible policy should be adopted to allow a certain level of development on the edge of all villages. E.g. By drawing settlement boundaries loosely so they include small sites promoted for development on the edge of villages.

Full text:

As set out under Policies S/DS and S/SH, we are very concerned that the proposed development strategy ignores the need for suitable levels of growth to come forwards in the rural areas in order to maintain the vitality of rural communities. Without growth, facilities and services in these villages will not be viable in the long term.

The proposed settlement boundary policy compounds this issue by severely restricting growth outside settlement boundaries. There will be a need for both market and affordable housing growth in all villages during the plan period and to resolve this issue, we consider that some growth should be allocated to all settlements or a flexible policy should be adopted to allow a certain level of development on the edge of all villages according to their position in the settlement hierarchy. One such flexible policy would be to draw settlement boundaries more loosely so that they include small sites promoted for development on the edge of villages. In this way, it would be possible allow suitable sites to come forward under Policy S/SB.