Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 58171
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Dr Stephen Kennedy
I support John Meed’s suggestions for strengthening the objectives of this policy. His suggestions are in the attached document.
Any development at S/CBC/A would be detrimental to the well-being of existing Queen Edith’s residents.
This policy should protect Nine Wells Nature Reserve, which is already under stress and being gradually degraded. This is before full development of S/CBC/M15, let alone development on S/CBC/E/2. The field between NWNR and and the railway line should be allocated for its protection and enhancement.
I support John Meed’s suggestions for strengthening the objectives of this policy. His suggestions are in the attached document.
Any development at S/CBC/A would be detrimental to the well-being of existing Queen Edith’s residents.
This policy should protect Nine Wells Nature Reserve, which is already under stress and being gradually degraded. This is before full development of S/CBC/M15, let alone development on S/CBC/E/2. The field between NWNR and and the railway line should be allocated for its protection and enhancement.