Comment
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options
Representation ID: 57965
Received: 12/12/2021
Respondent: Mr Daniel Lister
Representation Summary:
Thresholds for contribution to infrastructure should be replaced as they allow developments to be sized just underneath said thresholds to avoid contributions. Lots of small developments in the same area still bring increased load on services. Instead, a sliding scale contribution from all developments would make more sense.
Full text:
Thresholds for contribution to infrastructure should be replaced as they allow developments to be sized just underneath said thresholds to avoid contributions. Lots of small developments in the same area still bring increased load on services. Instead, a sliding scale contribution from all developments would make more sense.