Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options

Representation ID: 57308

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Charlotte Sawyer Nutt

Agent: Cheffins

Representation Summary:

Recent analyses of local property market dynamics indicate that affordable housing demands are still a focal concern for local authorities across the Greater Cambridge area. Dependence on the allocation of strategic sites with already high infrastructure burdens is unlikely to offer sustainable, long-term solutions to the chronic and worsening affordability issues being experienced across the Greater Cambridge area. Strategic sites alone do not deliver policy-compliant levels of affordable housing, so, if this is the target, more smaller sites in sustainable settlements (e.g. Great Abington) that are more likely to deliver affordable homes at a faster rate need to be allocated.

Full text:

The First Proposals plan sets a challenging target for affordable housing to reflect the acute and substantial need for affordable housing across Greater Cambridge. This places a great responsibility on all major developments to provide an element of affordable housing.

Policy H/AH will have a significant bearing on the viability of individual residential developments, so it is vital that the affordable housing requirement is achievable in practice. Although the First Proposals plan indicates that viability evidence will be reviewed as appropriate as part of the plan-making process, this is not sufficient. Planning Practice Guidance indicates that plans should set out circumstances where review mechanisms may be appropriate, as well as a clear process and terms of engagement regarding how and when viability will be reassessed over the lifetime of a development to ensure policy compliance and optimal public benefits through economic cycles. Draft Policy H/AH does not do this – changes in affordable housing tenure models or continued increases in build costs may render the viability evidence which underpins the affordable housing requirement out-of-date relatively quickly.

In relation to the development of Land North of Pampisford Road in Great Abington, “a demonstrable need for affordable housing in Great Abington and Little Abbington” was outlined by the Planning Committee when reviewing The Orchards development directly north of site 40539 (see S/3543/16/FL Great Abington Report). Recent analyses of local property market dynamics indicate that affordable housing demands are still a focal concern for local authorities across the Greater Cambridge area. According to recent housing needs projections, an annual net need of 435 affordable rental units and 105 affordable units for homeownership will be needed across South Cambridgeshire to satisfy housing demands. Indeed, these projections do not account for local variegation in housing needs, which may be higher for conurbations closer to epicentres of business growth (e.g. Great Abington). This is concerning as there are no allocations for residential development in the adopted Local Plan and no proposed allocations in Great Abington as part of the emerging GCLP. Dependence on the allocation of strategic sites with already high infrastructure burdens is unlikely to offer sustainable, long-term solutions to the chronic and worsening affordability issues manifesting across the Greater Cambridge area. Strategic sites alone do not deliver policy-compliant levels of affordable housing, so, if this is the target, more smaller sites that are far more likely to deliver a policy-compliant level of affordable homes at a faster rate need to be allocated.

Draft Policy H/AH of the First Proposals plan requires 40% affordable housing on sites of 10 or more dwellings. With a total of 135 dwellings proposed on Site 40539, 54 would be sought for affordable housing under this policy (of which at least 14 will be allocated as ‘First Homes’ under the national First Homes initiative). As well as helping to address the current shortage of affordable housing over the Greater Cambridge area, the delivery of up to 54 affordable dwellings would represent a significant positive for the social sustainability of the local area.