Question 6

Showing forms 301 to 330 of 369
Form ID: 55123
Respondent: Mr Matthew Asplin

Not at all

The densities appear to be very high compared to other developments in Cambridge / other large Towns & Cities and not in keeping with the surroundings. Recent examples of high density housing, at a very much lower level, such as Orchard Park have not been particularly successful in retaining a sense of community.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55132
Respondent: Jill Bloxhau

Not at all

Definitely not, as comment No 1 style of development is not suited to Cambridge. No one wants to live in high rise flats anymore.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55143
Respondent: Mr M B Lopresti

Mostly yes

No comment

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55153
Respondent: Mr Paul Jenkins

Mostly yes

No need for tall buildings at all.

No uploaded files for public display

File: 541_Response
Form ID: 55163
Respondent: B Fuller

Not at all

Don't care, you will build what you want anyway.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55173
Respondent: Chris Brown

Mostly not

Overall heights look too great. Residential max should be 5 and commercial max 10. Also try to avoid uniform 'block' feel (U.S/E. European) style. Some lower rise to give areas of more familiar human scale.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55183
Respondent: Jonathan Wilkins

Not at all

13 storeys is way of out character. No way you can compare a new build flat to Kings College- your new flats will have far less architectural quality.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55193
Respondent: Paul Clark

Not at all

No comment

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55202
Respondent: Tony Dadoum

Not at all

No. Proposals are too dense. Proposed heights are too excessive. Danger of creating a ghetto. Also more thought needed on screening the negative visual impact beyond development area. Mistakes at disastrous Kneighton development and Eddington development will be repeated. Both are visual excrescences on the landscape.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55212
Respondent: R Fairhurst

Neutral

No comment.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55222
Respondent: Mrs V S Gringell

Yes, completely

No comment.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55232
Respondent: Mrs C Sinclair

Not at all

Milton residents will be able to see the buildings, which will have a visual impact on the area as a whole.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55242
Respondent: Christine Turnbull

Nothing chosen

I disagree that this site should be used at all for housing development of any sort.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55252
Respondent: Mary Hall

Not at all

Buildings too high.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55264
Respondent: Graham Fairweather

Neutral

Mutli-storey buildings are too often ugly. I feel lockdown has demonstrated young families should not be housed above ground floor level and without easy access to a garden.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55274
Respondent: Simon Wilcox

Not at all

Too high, too compact, too many residents.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55285
Respondent: J Staggs

Not at all

Too high.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55295
Respondent: Liz Sheen

Not at all

No comment.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55307
Respondent: Mr Ze'ev Feigis

Mostly not

Higher buildings on the north of the site to reduce overshadowing and block A14 noise.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55330
Respondent: Barry John Buck

Mostly yes

Could look quite dramatic from a distance (might be visible from John Lewis restaurant window or Grafton car park roof. Thought should be given to red light on tallest building (39m) Although requirement is 80-96m (200ft) In consideration that light aircraft fly into Marshalls at present (until they leave!) Other tall blocks may also need warning lights.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55341
Respondent: M Isherwood

Nothing chosen

No comment

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55349
Respondent: Mrs JJ Lister

Not at all

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55360
Respondent: Elizabeth Simmonds

Not at all

Very unhappy about such tall buildings. I feel they are totally inappropriate in the area. Please do not compare to King's, which is a beautiful iconic structure.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55370
Respondent: Mr M J Whitaker

Not at all

NO.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55380
Respondent: Danielle Whittaker

Mostly yes

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55390
Respondent: Mr Stephen Mare

Mostly yes

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55400
Respondent: Chris Lowdon

Not at all

Such high density housing does not provide necessary private open space (gardens) since Covid19 people clearly need gardens. This form of dwelling will lead to future problems: see comment 1

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55410
Respondent: R Tripp

Neutral

I don't know anyone who would want to live in a 8 or 13 storey building. Most people want their own house. But is that a pipe dream

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55420
Respondent: Paula Meaney

Not at all

Looks ugly like CB1 and Eddington

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 55430
Respondent: Susan Thomas

Not at all

No, too high, and too high density

No uploaded files for public display