Question 15. Do you agree that we should aim to increase tree cover across the area?

Showing forms 1 to 30 of 162
Form ID: 44119
Respondent: Mr Mark Lewis

Yes, strongly agree

Well of course. Perhaps engage with the tree planting volunteering group that is active in Cambridge? (if not already)

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44143
Respondent: Mr Ben Bradnack

Yes, strongly agree

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44205
Respondent: Mrs Denise Adams

Yes, strongly agree

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44218
Respondent: Emily King

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes tree cover is good, but we should also consider what historic forms of carbon storage there have been in the area, and restore/enlarge them. E.g. fenland, peat, etc.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44257
Respondent: Ms Claire Shannon

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site development level and on a more strategic basis i.e. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such wider objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44329
Respondent: Dr Jamie Males

Yes, strongly agree

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44372
Respondent: Mr Albino Battaglia

Yes, strongly agree

More trees are always a good idea.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44385
Respondent: Mr Ken Warner

Yes, strongly agree

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44419
Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Yes, strongly agree

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44473
Respondent: West Wickham Parish Council

Yes, strongly agree

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44531
Respondent: Mx Kim Graham

Yes, somewhat agree

Tree planting needs to be thought of long term/holistically - who will maintain the trees over time, are they being used to support agroforestry, do they produce things people need, like nuts, fruit, or wood products??

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44566
Respondent: Mr Ben Pridgeon

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site level and on a more strategic basis - i.e. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44608
Respondent: Maarnford-Butler family Maarnford Farm, Duxford Butler family
Agent: Mr Ben Pridgeon

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site level and on a more strategic basis - i.e. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44658
Respondent: Jessica Brod

Yes, strongly agree

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44797
Respondent: The Executors of Mrs R. M. Rowley
Agent: Mr Ben Pridgeon

Yes, strongly agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site level and on a more strategic basis - i.e. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44842
Respondent: Huddleston WaR.J. Driver Trust Richard Molton
Agent: Mr Ben Pridgeon

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site level and on a more strategic basis - i.e. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44881
Respondent: Common Lane-R.J. Driver Trust Richard Molton
Agent: Mr Ben Pridgeon

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site level and on a more strategic basis - i.e. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44917
Respondent: Hugh Venables

Yes, somewhat agree

All habitats should be enhanced. Tree cover shouldn't be prioritised too strongly over grassland, wetland and scrub habitats

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 44959
Respondent: Mrs Ann Johnson
Agent: Cheffins

Yes, strongly agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site development level and on a more strategic basis i.e. creation of major new woodlands, this would be particularly beneficial within the Green Belt. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to wider objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45009
Respondent: Mr Robert Pearson
Agent: Cheffins

Yes, strongly agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site development level and on a more strategic basis i.e. creation of major new woodlands, this would be particularly beneficial within the Green Belt and on the periphery of elevated locations and large scale developments. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to wider objectives

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45126
Respondent: Mrs Sarah Smith

Yes, strongly agree

For developments above a certain size I think there should be a minimum standard for tree planting/cover

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45172
Respondent: Gonville & Caius College

Yes, somewhat agree

Agree – see answer to Q8. However, the College also recognises the need to balance this with the area’s other essential needs not least housing and employment growth in sustainable areas.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45242
Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Kiddy
Agent: Ms Claire Shannon

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site development level and on a more strategic basis e.g. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45275
Respondent: JC Hartley Property
Agent: Ms Claire Shannon

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site development level and on a more strategic basis i.e. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such wider objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45449
Respondent: David Chaplin
Agent: Cheffins

Yes, strongly agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site development level and on a more strategic basis i.e. creation of major new woodlands, this would be particularly beneficial within the Green Belt and on the periphery of elevated locations. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to wider objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45513
Respondent: Stephen & Jane Graves
Agent: Cheffins

Yes, strongly agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site development level and on a more strategic basis i.e. creation of major new woodlands, this would be particularly beneficial within the Green Belt. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions towards wider objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45556
Respondent: Ms Jane Neal

Yes, strongly agree

So stop chopping down trees or allowing the hopping down of trees that local community members are SCREAMING at you to protect. See Hooper Street end of the horrific Depot development, as a prime example of where the Council got it wrong AGAIN.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45597
Respondent: Axis Land Partnerships

Yes, somewhat agree

5.16 Yes. With the right trees, in the right areas. A policy framework to seek tree cover increase but allows for a planning balance within decision-making to enable the benefits and impacts of each development to be assessed. This could be part of an on-site/off-site solution, which could generate notable s106 funds to achieve significant, meaningful and long-term planted and ecological areas. Ecological outcomes rather than an unconditional focus on native species should be considered in new planting.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45653
Respondent: Mr David Wright
Agent: Mr Ben Pridgeon

Yes, somewhat agree

Yes. This could be at both individual site level and on a more strategic basis - i.e. creation of major new woodlands. Potentially, biodiversity net gain can be achieved for smaller developments through financial contributions to such objectives.

No uploaded files for public display

Form ID: 45693
Respondent: Pigeon Land 2 Ltd .
Agent: DLP Planning Ltd

Yes, strongly agree

Pigeon strongly agree that the Plan should aim to increase tree cover across the area as a key part of achieving net zero carbon emissions within the area by 2050. In this regard, the proposed scheme for Pigeon’s site on Land south of St Neots Road, Hardwick will include extensive tree planting in the form of both tree-lined streets and extensive boundary planting to achieve a significant increase in tree planting across the site.

No uploaded files for public display