Draft North East Cambridge Area Action Plan

Yes, completely

This is a ridiculously, offensively leading question. There is no option "far too much". This whole consultation is a sham. I will write a separate complaint if I can find the relevant address.

Yes, completely

In fact you're doing too much. Green roofs will just add to the cost of buildings; all you need to do is build good family homes! People not nature!

Mostly yes

I'm not sure the Green High Street will ever have any shops on it?!

Not at all

Physical commercial space is not going to be in demand going forwards which also means there will be less low paid jobs servicing those spaces e.g. shop work etc. It's not at all clear who will want to live in those houses by the time they are complete as the higher skilled workers will either want cars to exploit job opportunities or larger houses to work from home

Yes, completely

No answer given

Not at all

The people working skilled jobs won't want to live in the flats being proposed. Less office space and larger houses would be a more 21st century approach

Neutral

I'm not sure local shops will be viable in the future (except your basic corner shops)

Mostly not

The walking and cycling connections look reasonable but it probably comes at the expense of the road volume that will enable people to live in the houses

Strongly disagree

Homes should be built that people want to live in with plenty of space for cars and should be freehold (which I assume these will not be because they will have 4+ storeys). They should not be leasehold as an excuse for the developer to rip off the buyers with ever-increasing service charges. I currently rent and would certainly not buy a house in the proposed development. With the coronavirus crisis, it is clear there is value to spacious homes with gardens...whereas cramming people in close to fixed commercial areas will become increasingly anachronistic in high-tech industries where people have the ability to work from home.

Yes, completely

This is also a ridiculously, offensively leading question. There is no option "far too much". This whole consultation is a sham.