North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Search representations

Results for British Horse Society search

New search New search

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 11: Are there any particular land uses that should be accommodated in the North East Cambridge area?

Representation ID: 33474

Received: 24/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

Due to a lack of safe off road routes for equestrians, Barton & District Bridleways Group would like to add our support for equestrian inclusion in the North East Cambridge Area Action Plan.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 25: As set out in this chapter there are a range of public transport, cycling and walking schemes planned which will improve access to the North East Cambridge area. What other measures shoul

Representation ID: 33475

Received: 24/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

Barton & District Bridleways Group has over 100 members and may ride in the North East Cambridge area, such as Milton Country Park, which is open to horses. With the Guided Busway Bridleway and the potential link with Waterbeach Greenway, there is potential for equestrians from South West Cambridge to access areas of North East Cambridge.

In the area we have local endurance riders, who need to train for longer rides, and instead of having to take their horses elsewhere, if the Bridleway network, including NMU paths was more joined up, they could ride more locally.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 57: What community facilities are particularly needed in the North East Cambridge area?

Representation ID: 33476

Received: 24/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

Barton & District Bridleways Group would like to add our support for equestrian inclusion in the North East Cambridge Area Action Plan.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 3: In this chapter have we correctly identified the physical characteristics of the North East Cambridge area and its surroundings?

Representation ID: 33687

Received: 21/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

There are many reasons for the provision of off road access for equestrians in North East Cambridge with that of safety being the most important.

The British Horse Society puts forward that equestrian access is currently available at Milton Country Park. Safe equestrian access, therefore, can be readily extended in this scheme.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 6: Do you agree with the overarching Objectives? If not, what might you change?

Representation ID: 33688

Received: 21/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

[objective 5]: NEC will integrate with surrounding communities, spreading the benefits it delivers to surrounding areas.
The opportunity to link equestrians in Waterbeach to Histon and beyond would provide a benefit.

[objective 4] NEC will provide a new model for low car dependency living, through maximising the use of and integrating with public transport, walking and cycling infrastructure.

Transport includes journeys for leisure which includes horse riding.

[objective 10] NEC will be a healthy place, with a focus on creating a new community with good health and wellbeing.
The health benefits of equestrianism is well documented and noted below.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 7: Do you support the overall approach shown in the Indicative Concept Plan? Do you have any comments or suggestions to make?

Representation ID: 33689

Received: 21/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

The NEC Indicative Concept Plan (at Figure 6.1) begins to describe the kind of place that could be created with the successful regeneration of the area. Movement and the ability to do so easily on foot, by bike or on public transport is central to making the area a well-connected place that reduces the need to travel by car. A high quality green route that supports sustainable transport will improve connections from the Cambridge North Station to the Cambridge Science Park, and reduce Milton Road barriers.

Therefore access across Milton Road should be multi user and include equestrian provision.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 13: Should the AAP require developments in the North East Cambridge AAP area to apply Healthy Towns principles?

Representation ID: 33690

Received: 21/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 6.14 states studies that have emphasised the relationship between planning and health and wellbeing of new communities, with the AAP needing to include health related policies. This would contribute to making the NEC a healthy and safe place.

The health benefits of equestrianism are well known and noted in the Case for the Inclusion of Equestrian Access included in my full statement.

In response to para 6.1: Northstowes inclusion in NHS Healthy Towns Initiative, which included Homes England and planners working closely with the British Horse Society to include equestrian provision: There are opportunities to apply similar principles in North East Cambridge and include a network of bridleways / multi user routes are included in this project.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 16: Should the AAP include any or a combination of the options below to improve pedestrian and cycling connectivity through the site and to the surrounding area?

Representation ID: 33691

Received: 21/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

The British Horse Society supports equestrian access which is identified in para6.21 and mentioned in this Clause as 'crucial' yet it is not included anywhere in the project. This needs to be rectified.

Wherever links are proposed between communities for pedestrian and cyclists, equestrians should be included unless there is good reason for them not to be. The BHS is the authoritative body to make these decisions. The Greenways are multi user routes - it is very disappointing to see that equestrian access mentioned in the preamble has not been included.

BHS comments:
OptionA: Multi user access required not the provision of restrictive cycle and pedestrian access.

OptionC:
Multi user access required not the provision of restrictive cycle and pedestrian access.

OptionE:
Equestrian access required on the inter community links.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 24: Within the North East Cambridge area green space can be provided in a number of forms including the following options. Which of the following would you support?

Representation ID: 33692

Received: 21/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

Peripheral routes around significant green spaces should be multi user routes [and include equestrian provision].

The presence of equestrians has been reported by Landscape Architects as discouraging antisocial behaviour.

Further:

Para6.34: Any such infrastructure must be multiuser-to do otherwise would be contrary to the Cambridgeshire Rights of Way Improvement Plan since the creation of restrictive pedestrian and cycle only access further fragments the already inadequate bridleway network.

Thus the British Horse Society supports: F-Creation of enhanced pedestrian and cycle connectivity to Milton Country Park and the River Cam corridor.

Comment

North East Cambridge Area Action Plan Issues and Options 2019

Question 25: As set out in this chapter there are a range of public transport, cycling and walking schemes planned which will improve access to the North East Cambridge area. What other measures shoul

Representation ID: 33693

Received: 21/03/2019

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

The British Horse Society are seeking:

All routes linking to settlements or rights of way which are currently proposed as shared cycle and pedestrian should be delivered as multiuser (pedestrian, cyclists and equestrian) paths.

All crossings over, under or around barriers such as roads, railways or rivers should be multi user [to allow for equestrian usage].

Objectives set out in paragraphs 7.12 and 7.13 must be multiuser for all the reasons already quoted throughout the chapter principles.

Bridleway provision can be met in the S.106 Agreement.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.