Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Search representations

Results for Coulson Building Group search

New search New search

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 12

Representation ID: 30304

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

This or option 2 should go forward.

Full text:

This or option 2 should go forward.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 13

Representation ID: 30305

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

This is too ambitious and will never happen. the cost of moving the sewage works is unlikely to give a development profit and where would the sewage works go?

Full text:

This is too ambitious and will never happen. the cost of moving the sewage works is unlikely to give a development profit and where would the sewage works go?

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 15

Representation ID: 30306

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

Too much unknown detail to comment at this stage but it should be high quality design with similar objectives to the University's North West Cambridge site.

Full text:

Too much unknown detail to comment at this stage but it should be high quality design with similar objectives to the University's North West Cambridge site.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 16

Representation ID: 30307

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

Seems OK.

Full text:

Seems OK.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 17

Representation ID: 30308

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

Option C. Cambridge has a strange aversion to tall buildings which can make much more efficient use of land and add a dramatic and eye catching aspect to a development. With the fens to the north tall buildings will not affect the view of Cambridge and will add a feature to the skyline.

Full text:

Option C. Cambridge has a strange aversion to tall buildings which can make much more efficient use of land and add a dramatic and eye catching aspect to a development. With the fens to the north tall buildings will not affect the view of Cambridge and will add a feature to the skyline.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 18a

Representation ID: 30309

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

Cambridge has a strange aversion to tall buildings which can make much more efficient use of land and add a dramatic and eye catching aspect to a development. With the fens to the north tall buildings will not affect the view of Cambridge and will add a feature to the skyline.

Full text:

See answer to previous question [Question 17].

Question 17 response: Option C. Cambridge has a strange aversion to tall buildings which can make much more efficient use of land and add a dramatic and eye catching aspect to a development. With the fens to the north tall buildings will not affect the view of Cambridge and will add a feature to the skyline.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 18b

Representation ID: 30310

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

Cambridge has a strange aversion to tall buildings which can make much more efficient use of land and add a dramatic and eye catching aspect to a development. With the fens to the north tall buildings will not affect the view of Cambridge and will add a feature to the skyline.

Full text:

See answer to Q17.

Question 17 response: Option C. Cambridge has a strange aversion to tall buildings which can make much more efficient use of land and add a dramatic and eye catching aspect to a development. With the fens to the north tall buildings will not affect the view of Cambridge and will add a feature to the skyline.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 18c

Representation ID: 30311

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

Option C. Cambridge has a strange aversion to tall buildings which can make much more efficient use of land and add a dramatic and eye catching aspect to a development. With the fens to the north tall buildings will not affect the view of Cambridge and will add a feature to the skyline.

Full text:

See answer to Q17 [below]

Question 17 response: Option C. Cambridge has a strange aversion to tall buildings which can make much more efficient use of land and add a dramatic and eye catching aspect to a development. With the fens to the north tall buildings will not affect the view of Cambridge and will add a feature to the skyline.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 19

Representation ID: 30312

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 20

Representation ID: 30313

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.