Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Search representations

Results for Cambridge Past, Present and Future search

New search New search

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 1

Representation ID: 30349

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

The vision of major remaining brown field site needs substantially strengthening - to:
* maximise land use
* create important opening to Fenlands/ Districts
* develop on a larger/ denser scale and enhance site
* avoid substantial risk of a piecemeal strategy
* substantially contribute to longer term requirements of city by providing revitalised gateway, more employment led/ mixed use community; it has not yet achieved provision of a substantial/ distinctive/ modern/ dynamic/sustainable/vibrant urban community - it needs to deliver substantial City's future housing (aiding relocation/ reconfiguration of the water treatment plant - essential to the strategy for the site).

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 2

Representation ID: 30355

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

Complex scheme - higher ambitious/ coherent manner needed as hotch potch not acceptable.
Objectives need strengthening to reflect scale/ density of development necessary to attract momentum. Specific goals are key - to:
* achieve relocation/ reconfiguration of water treatment plant
* provide substantial new employment opportunities
* provide residential development on a sufficient scale - more vibrant/ highly sustainable
* consider denser utilisation/ regeneration (eg Science Park)
* create connectivity between Science Park, city centre, NE/E Cambridge, villages, beyond
* enable preparation of detailed, phased master plan - a clearer vision underpinning redevelopment of overall area - including integration of denser developments - enhanced viability and associated quality

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 3

Representation ID: 30356

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

The eastern boundary of the AAP is hard up against the railway line. This limitation constrains opportunities for the provision of residential development, as well as accessible and high quality open space and transport links that increase the permeability of the site, particularly to the north and east. The eastern boundary should be re-drawn to include land either side of Fen Road and up to the River Cam, with the proviso that development in that area should not compromise Green Belt principles

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 4

Representation ID: 30357

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

The inclusion of the Cambridge Science Park enables the formulation of guiding principles and development management policies to help shape the intensification of development within the business park including the consideration of its connectivity to the east of Milton Road.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 5

Representation ID: 30358

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

The triangular area to the south of the sidings should unquestionably be included within the boundary of the AAP. Doing so will underpin improvements in the CNFE's connectivity through the provision of a pedestrian/cycle access as part of the Chisholm Trail.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 9

Representation ID: 30359

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

Objective 1a, which argues for adaption over time, is a recipe for a piecemeal approach which lacks the coherence and critical mass needed to maximise the potential the area has to contribute to the future of the City and South Cambs.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 10

Representation ID: 30360

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

CambridgePPF strongly objects to Option 1 (see response to Options 3 & 4) as it does not offer a sufficiently ambitious vision for this vitally important site

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 11

Representation ID: 30361

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

CambridgePPF strongly objects to Option 2 (see response to Options 3 & 4 in full text) as it does not offer a sufficiently ambitious vision for this vitally important site.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 12

Representation ID: 30362

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

This is our second preference option. We support it as a reserve option in the event that Option 4 is not deliverable. Reconfiguring the water treatment plant as proposed will greatly improve the development potential of the overall site, but not as optimally as Option 4.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Question 13

Representation ID: 30363

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future

Representation Summary:

This is our first preference Option. Removal of the water treatment plant from the site would maximise development potential and improve air quality conditions both on the site and elsewhere in the vicinity. We recognise that much work will be needed to make this option deliverable and urge the local authorities and Anglian Water to work together to find solutions that would allow it to be achieved.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.