Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Search representations
Results for Grosvenor Developments search
New searchSupport
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 23b
Representation ID: 30157
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 23c
Representation ID: 30159
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
The Science Park has significant potential for future enhancement and connections with the rest of the area and the wider surroundings. To exclude it risks stagnation and uncoordinated future development in the Science Park that could be detrimental or conflict with the CNFE area. The inclusion of the Science Park could also facilitate a more coordinated approach to the use of Section 106 and CIL funding across the area.
The Science Park has significant potential for future enhancement and connections with the rest of the area and the wider surroundings. To exclude it risks stagnation and uncoordinated future development in the Science Park that could be detrimental or conflict with the CNFE area. The inclusion of the Science Park could also facilitate a more coordinated approach to the use of Section 106 and CIL funding across the area.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 24a
Representation ID: 30160
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 24b
Representation ID: 30162
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 24c
Representation ID: 30163
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 24d
Representation ID: 30164
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
Potential for relocation of uses beyond the AAP boundary should also be considered as creates a greater opportunity for the area.
Potential for relocation of uses beyond the AAP boundary should also be considered as creates a greater opportunity for the area.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 25
Representation ID: 30167
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
Would expect this to potentially go beyond current provisions.
Would expect this to potentially go beyond current provisions.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 26a
Representation ID: 30168
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 26b
Representation ID: 30169
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Question 26c
Representation ID: 30170
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
