Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Search representations

Results for Jaynic Properties Ltd search

New search New search

Support

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy S/JH: New jobs and homes

Representation ID: 212876

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Jaynic Properties Ltd

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

It is evident that the evidence base to the emerging draft Local Plan has continually identified strong demand for industrial (Use class B2 and B8) floorspace. The confirmation of this demand in policy in the Proposed Submission Greater Cambridge Local Plan is strongly welcomed.

The identification of need for 317,000 sqm of industrial / warehousing (use classes B2/B8) is supported.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Chapter 2: Development strategy

Representation ID: 212882

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Jaynic Properties Ltd

Agent: Carter Jonas

Representation Summary:

This representation relates to a site submission (HELAA Reference 45107: Land to the south of the A14 Services, Boxworth)

The allocation of land south of Cambridge Services for employment development, plus one other site, along the A14 is strongly supported.

It is envisaged that this Site will offer a range of new employment opportunities, bringing forward approximately 90,000 sq m of employment floorspace for industrial and warehousing uses (B2 and B8). This will help meet the identified employment need and support the occupational requirements of the local economy; together with providing additional lorry parking to alleviate the critical local shortage. This element of the Development Strategy is supported.

Object

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy S/RRA/SCS: Land to the South of Cambridge Services, A14

Representation ID: 212888

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Jaynic Properties Ltd

Agent: Carter Jonas

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

This representation relates to a site submission (HELAA ref 45107 Land to the south of the A14 Services, Boxworth)

Whilst Draft Policy S/RRA/SCS: Land to the South of Cambridge Services, A14 is much supported by Jaynic Properties Limited (Jaynic), it believes that a number of minor amendments are needed to elements of the policy wording in order to ensure that the Draft Plan is sound, including a small increase to site area.

Object

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy BG/BG: Biodiversity and geodiversity

Representation ID: 212900

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Jaynic Properties Ltd

Agent: Carter Jonas

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

We object to the requirement in draft Policy BG/BG that development must provide a minimum 20% biodiversity net gain. This is contrary to Policy N1: Identifying Environmental Opportunities and Safeguards in the NPPF (August 2026). In particular, paragraph 2.

Object

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy WS/IO: Creating inclusive employment and business opportunities through new developments

Representation ID: 212902

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Jaynic Properties Ltd

Agent: Carter Jonas

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Jaynic are particularly concerned regarding the incorporation of rigid and inflexible targets within the policy.
Section 4.requires that development proposals must secure 20% of all jobs created by the construction phase of the development for local residents. Whilst the aspiration to ensure job creation for local people is supported, it is not clear what evidence is available to demonstrate that this rigid requirement figure is either appropriate or achievable throughout the Greater Cambridge area taking into account the existing and likely labour market this policy would be drawing upon.

Object

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy J/AW: Affordable workspace and creative industries

Representation ID: 212905

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Jaynic Properties Ltd

Agent: Carter Jonas

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Whilst Jaynic is supportive of the objectives behind the policy, it believes that it is important to recognise that in many instances it will not be operationally appropriate or practical to deliver affordable workspace on-site. We are also aware that in London similar affordable workspace policies have been found to be unworkable, despite the London Plan recognising that Boroughs should tailor such policies to meet the specific circumstances of their areas. Furthermore, it must be recognised that the Greater Cambridge Authorities are also intending to introduce a Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) in addition to S.106 policy contributions which has the potential to impact scheme viability alongside any additional development costs such as this policy which would erode future scheme capital and revenue values.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.