Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Search representations

Results for Whittlesford Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Chapter 3.4: The rural southern cluster

Representation ID: 214715

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Whittlesford Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council remains concerned about the cumulative impact of multiple large-scale allocations within the Rural Southern Cluster. Taken together, these proposals will place significant pressure on strategic roads, village streets, health services and water resources.
The Plan’s objective to reduce reliance on the private car must be grounded in realistic alternatives and infrastructure delivered in advance of development. Water availability should be treated as a fundamental constraint on growth rather than an assumed future solution. Again, the Parish Council feels that the Draft Plan is not sound in its approach to the Rural Southern Cluster.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy S/GF: Land adjacent to A11 and A1307 at Grange Farm

Representation ID: 214716

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Whittlesford Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The proposed allocation of a new settlement of approximately 4,500 homes represents development on an unprecedented scale in the southern area of the District. The proposed settlement would create by far the
largest settlement in the area and would have profound impacts on the A505 corridor and surrounding villages, including Whittlesford. Although the number of homes in the proposed settlement have been reduced, the Parish Council still feels that inadequate safeguards in respect of transport mitigations are included in the Plan. The Council is also concerned that the policy does not adequately address water supply and
wastewater capacity.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy S/AMC/WHD: Whittlesford Parkway Station Area, Whittlesford Bridge Area of Major Change

Representation ID: 214719

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Whittlesford Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council supports the designation of a policy area but considers that the policy significantly underestimates future demand and, as currently drafted, failed to recognize the reality of the policy area. The policy does not recognise the impact of passenger numbers increasing as a result of growth across the Cluster and parking pressures already impacting Station Road East. The Council requests that improved platform connectivity via a lift, enhanced cycle links to local villages, a deliverable commitment to increasing public transport links to the station and village, a clear parking and access strategy that protects residential amenity, and measures to address flooding and highway safety are included.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy S/RSC/FSS: Former Spicers Site, Sawston Business Park, Sawston

Representation ID: 214722

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Whittlesford Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council supports the principle of a policy framework for the Former Spicers Site but considers that it should be strengthened to deliver clear public benefits and to reflect the site’s relationship with Whittlesford, Sawston and Shelford. The policy refers to access to the A1301 but does not adequately address access to Whittlesford Road. The policy should explicitly require safe and direct routes connecting the site to Whittlesford village, Whittlesford Parkway Station, and a dedicated cycleway along Shelford-Whittlesford Roads, connecting the site to Little Shelford and improving safe active travel connectivity and public access between Whittlesford and Shelford.

Comment

Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Proposed Submission

Policy H/AH: Affordable Housing

Representation ID: 214723

Received: 24/09/2026

Respondent: Whittlesford Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council supports the aspiration for affordable housing as defined in planning terms. However, there is a need to develop effective strategies to tackle the root cause of housing unaffordability which is the high price of housing for sale. Policies to promote affordable housing
in the sense of affordable market sale, particularly through the increased provision of one and two bed starter homes for market sale, would begin to tackle the fundamental problem with housing affordability in our area. The viability study supporting the draft plan envisages that only 35% of new market -sale homes will be one or two bedrooms, compared to 55% of modelled new affordable housing.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.