Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Search representations

Results for CALA Group Ltd search

New search New search

Object

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/JH: New jobs and homes

Representation ID: 202309

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The total number of dwellings that the Councils calculate will be provided across the emerging Plan Period is greater than the standard method, which is supported. However, the potential for additional growth to support the ambitions of the Cambridge Growth Company and by extension, the Government, should be incorporated into the draft Local Plan as a material consideration. Therefore, Policy S/JH should be revised to incorporate the additional growth ambition of the Cambridge Growth Company, updating the housing‑need calculation accordingly.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/RRA: Other site allocations in the rest of the rural area

Representation ID: 211089

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

These representations are accompanied by the submission of Land to the west of Water Lane, Melbourn, Cambridgeshire (HELAA Reference 40274) for consideration as an allocation within the Greater Cambridge Local Plan.

Alongside the two already proposed allocation sites, the Site could provide additional housing to support sustainable growth of the settlement, which contributes towards the Councils’ overall housing needs as well as providing an opportunity for the village to grow and thrive by supporting local services.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/DS: Development strategy

Representation ID: 211410

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

The Development Strategy is so reliant on high levels of housing delivery in major strategic sites that risk local housing needs not being met over the Local Plan period. The Housing Trajectory is based on over-optimistic delivery rates for strategic sites, well above historic rates, and is not credible. The draft Local Plan is reliant on new settlement sites delivering 350 dwellings per annum, but it is considered that a more realistic delivery rate would be 200 dwellings per annum.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/DS: Development strategy

Representation ID: 211411

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

We do not consider that the delivery rates for these North East Cambridge, Cambridge East, Cambourne North, or Grange Farm are realistic, particularly the settlements that are yet to have been granted planning permission.

The current housing trajectory figures are overly ambitious for new settlements. There would be a reduction in 3,000 homes across the Plan Period which would not be delivered on new settlements. The Councils’ housing trajectory is also reliant on the new settlements delivering 350 dwellings per annum. This is equivalent to seven plots delivering 50 dwellings per annum, by several housebuilders. Our evidence demonstrates that none of these new settlements achieved, on average, 350 dwellings per annum.

In order to meet this shortfall, the Councils should focus on providing smaller and medium sized sites in and adjoining existing settlements, especially ones that have a
number of services and facilities, such as Melbourn.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/CBN: Cambourne North

Representation ID: 211412

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

The delivery of Cambourne North is principally reliant on the proposed new station that will be delivered as part of
East West Rail.

Although, as part of the spending review, the
Government committed a further £2.5 billion for the continued delivery of East West Rail. Whilst this Government is fully committed to the delivery of East West Rail, there are no guarantees that a future government would be as committed. Therefore, the emerging
Local Plan should focus more growth in Rural/Minor Rural Centres, which are considered sustainable, such as Melbourn.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/GF: Land adjacent to A11 and A1307 at Grange Farm

Representation ID: 211413

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

We are concerned that there is not sufficient infrastructure to deliver this Site, particularly as this will be a sustainable new town, located at the heart of the Rural Southern Cluster.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/GF: Land adjacent to A11 and A1307 at Grange Farm

Representation ID: 211414

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

The Deliverability Paper that was submitted for Grange Farm as part of the previous ‘call for sites’, confirms that 3,560 dwellings (market and affordable) can be delivered during the emerging Local Plan period with the first dwellings being delivered in 2030. Yet, The Councils’ housing trajectory states that only 2,550 dwellings can be delivered during the Plan Period, so our client would question how accurate these figures are by both the
Councils and the promoter for Grange Farm.

There is also a discrepancy between the number in the Housing Trajectory provided by the Council (up to 300 dwellings in 2040) and only 275 dwellings in the Housing Deliverability Paper, produced by the promoters of Grange Farm. Therefore, our client has concerns that the Council will not be able to deliver that number of dwellings across the Plan Period.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/DS: Development strategy

Representation ID: 211415

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

Policy S/DS takes no account of the sustainability benefits of locating some appropriately sized development within or adjacent to existing villages in South Cambridgeshire.

Villages of all sizes with South Cambridgeshire benefit from increases in the housing stock: those with links to village can remain or return, new residents can find homes, the usage of local shops, community facilities and schools is increased. This maintains the resilience of
established communities.

However, the draft Local Plan makes allocations for just 265 homes on four sites adjacent to existing villages (Duxford, Highfields, and Melbourn). This is the outcome of a fundamental flaw in the framing of the hierarchy of locations within this policy, which reflects an approach to sustainability that gives predominant weight to environmental factors, notably transport emissions, to the
detriment of the social sustainability of existing settlements.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Appendix E: Housing trajectory and five year housing land supply calculation

Representation ID: 211416

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

The Housing Trajectory is based on over-optimistic delivery rates for major strategic sites, well above historic rates, and is not credible. Anticipated completions for 2028/29 and 2029/30 are particularly high. A more reasonable estimate for sites such as Northstowe, Waterbeach New Town and North West Cambridge reduces the five-year supply to under 5.

Given historic experience of both general and site-specific causes of delays and reductions in delivery rates, notably the delivery of major infrastructure, it is not credible to assume that seven major strategic sites will all be able to deliver at historically exceptional rates.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy S/SH: Settlement hierarchy

Representation ID: 211417

Received: 28/01/2026

Respondent: CALA Group Ltd

Agent: Lanpro Services

Representation Summary:

Our client notes that Melbourn has been designated as a Minor Rural Centre, which means that it has the same status as its designation in the current Local Plan (2018).

Melbourn could be re-designated as a Rural Centre. The Settlement Hierarchy Paper that Greater Cambridge produced in 2021 allocate 14 points, with high scores for shops and services and secondary school. The paper adds that Melbourn is the largest village in the south-west of the district. It also acknowledges that there is a Greater Cambridge Partnership Greenway Scheme, which will provide better accessibility to Cambridge by sustainable modes of transport.

Our client notes that Melbourn has a higher score than Rural Centres in terms of secondary school provision than Great Shelford and Stapleford, which is designated as a Rural Centre.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.