Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation
Search representations
Results for Mr R Raywood, Mr A Bradney and Mr D Unwin search
New searchObject
Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation
Policy S/SH: Settlement hierarchy
Representation ID: 211107
Received: 30/01/2026
Respondent: Mr R Raywood, Mr A Bradney and Mr D Unwin
Agent: Turley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
This approach has repeatedly been shown to be problematic, particularly regarding
delivery timeframes, and is inconsistent with key principles of the NPPF. Paragraph 72 of
The Framework acknowledges the importance of strategic housing land supply comprising
a sufficient mix of sites, regarding availability, suitability and economic viability.
Please refer to the document submission for the full DLP Response
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation
Policy S/SH: Settlement hierarchy
Representation ID: 211108
Received: 30/01/2026
Respondent: Mr R Raywood, Mr A Bradney and Mr D Unwin
Agent: Turley
Paragraph 72a states that ‘land to accommodate at least 10% of their housing
requirement on sites no larger than one hectare; unless it can be shown, through the
preparation of relevant plan policies, that there are strong reasons why this 10% target
cannot be achieved’. According to this data, 94% of all new dwellings proposed between 2024 and 2045 are
allocated across only 6 sites, 3 of which are new settlements. The ‘Rest of the Rural Area’
comprises rural centres and group villages, a total of 48 settlements, and has only 3 sites
allocated for a total of 205 new homes.
The proportion of development attributed to major, strategic sites not only carries a huge
risk to deliverability but is also inconsistent with The Framework.
Please refer to the document submission for the full DLP Response