Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Search representations

Results for Vistry Group search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy CC/IW: Integrated water management, sustainable drainage and water quality

Representation ID: 210295

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Vistry Group

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Vistry and The Quy Estate consider that Policy CC/IW should be implemented flexibly, with appropriate reliance placed on the statutory duties of water companies and ongoing engagement through established mechanisms such as Water Resource Management Plans and Drainage and Wastewater Management Plans.

Full text:

This submission relates to Land at Fen Ditton (HELAA Ref. 47647 and HELAA Ref. 200770).

We write of behalf of our client, Vistry, to submit representations to the GCLP Regulation 18 Consultation on the Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan.

To support the submission, please find attached the following documents:
• Land at Fen Ditton – GCLP Regulation 18 Representations – Vistry & Quy Estate.
• Appendix 1 – Vision Document
• Appendix 2 – Landscape and Visual Advice Note & Initial Green Belt Review
• Appendix 3 – Review of the Sustainability Performance of Fen Ditton

I would be grateful if you could please confirm safe receipt of this email and its submission to the consultation.

Support

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy CC/CE: Supporting a circular economy and sustainable resource use

Representation ID: 210296

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Vistry Group

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Vistry and The Quy Estate support the intent of Policy CC/CE and welcome the flexibility built into paragraph 1 of the policy, which allows proposals to demonstrate compliance with the circular economy principles where “practical and viable” to meet all requirements in full.

Full text:

This submission relates to Land at Fen Ditton (HELAA Ref. 47647 and HELAA Ref. 200770).

We write of behalf of our client, Vistry, to submit representations to the GCLP Regulation 18 Consultation on the Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan.

To support the submission, please find attached the following documents:
• Land at Fen Ditton – GCLP Regulation 18 Representations – Vistry & Quy Estate.
• Appendix 1 – Vision Document
• Appendix 2 – Landscape and Visual Advice Note & Initial Green Belt Review
• Appendix 3 – Review of the Sustainability Performance of Fen Ditton

I would be grateful if you could please confirm safe receipt of this email and its submission to the consultation.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy CC/CE: Supporting a circular economy and sustainable resource use

Representation ID: 210297

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Vistry Group

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Vistry and The Quy Estate have concerns regarding paragraph 5 of the policy, which introduces a requirement for the submission of a Circular Economy (CE) Statement. It is considered that this requirement relates to the information needed to support a planning application rather than to the policy tests against which proposals should be assessed. As such, this requirement would be more appropriately addressed through the Council’s validation requirements, rather than embedded within the policy itself. Vistry and The Quy Estate also believe that the submission of such a statement and/ or information within a Sustainability Statement should be limited at outline planning application stage given that building design information is very limited at that stage. A CE statement should be reserved for detailed design stage only where it will be more meaningful in terms of information.

Full text:

This submission relates to Land at Fen Ditton (HELAA Ref. 47647 and HELAA Ref. 200770).

We write of behalf of our client, Vistry, to submit representations to the GCLP Regulation 18 Consultation on the Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan.

To support the submission, please find attached the following documents:
• Land at Fen Ditton – GCLP Regulation 18 Representations – Vistry & Quy Estate.
• Appendix 1 – Vision Document
• Appendix 2 – Landscape and Visual Advice Note & Initial Green Belt Review
• Appendix 3 – Review of the Sustainability Performance of Fen Ditton

I would be grateful if you could please confirm safe receipt of this email and its submission to the consultation.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Policy CC/CS: Supporting land-based carbon sequestration and carbon sinks

Representation ID: 210298

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Vistry Group

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

There are varying types and quantities of peat, some of which are in poor condition and emitting carbon. Vistry and The Quy Estate consider that there could be the opportunity for overall carbon benefits with a suitable peat restoration plan which should be encouraged within the policy to allow developers the flexibility to build new homes whist protecting or enhancing valuable peat soils.

This approach would ensure that the policy’s objectives are met, while avoiding the imposition of unnecessary upfront requirements that could affect the timely determination of applications.

Full text:

This submission relates to Land at Fen Ditton (HELAA Ref. 47647 and HELAA Ref. 200770).

We write of behalf of our client, Vistry, to submit representations to the GCLP Regulation 18 Consultation on the Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan.

To support the submission, please find attached the following documents:
• Land at Fen Ditton – GCLP Regulation 18 Representations – Vistry & Quy Estate.
• Appendix 1 – Vision Document
• Appendix 2 – Landscape and Visual Advice Note & Initial Green Belt Review
• Appendix 3 – Review of the Sustainability Performance of Fen Ditton

I would be grateful if you could please confirm safe receipt of this email and its submission to the consultation.

Comment

Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation

Rest of the Rural Area

Representation ID: 211625

Received: 30/01/2026

Respondent: Vistry Group

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

The accompanying representations relate specifically to Vistry’s land interest to the north of the current alignment of the A428 at Croxton (HELAA Reference 40288), referred to as "Land at Croxton Garden Village". See Section 3 and the associated Vision Document for further details.

A new Garden Village in this location would have a highly functional relationship with Cambourne and would look to this expanded settlement to provide a wider range of
goods and services. Importantly, the proximity of Croxton Garden Village to Cambourne would also allow for viable transport connections by active modes.

These representations do not seek to respond to every policy of the emerging GCLP, as a broader commentary on the various policies of the GCLP is provided in other written responses prepared on behalf of Vistry to support their other site interests in the area.

Change suggested by respondent:

Allocate Land at Croxton Garden Village as part of the Local Plan.

Full text:

Good afternoon

Land at Croxton (Croxton Garden Village proposal)

Regulation 18 Submissions
Turley on behalf of Vistry

On behalf of our client, Vistry, we are pleased to submit the attached representations to the above consultation.

Our submission comprises:

An overarching planning response, focusing on the spatial strategy specific to the site location.

A Vision Document, which sets out the development opportunity presented by the site and how this relates to the above (Appendix 1).

We trust that this information is of assistance, however if you have any queries or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Vistry also welcomes the opportunity to further engage with the shared planning service in relation to the delivery of the site, where this will be of assistance.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.