Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation
Search representations
Results for Linton Parish Council search
New searchComment
Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation
Policy S/GF: Land adjacent to A11 and A1307 at Grange Farm
Representation ID: 201669
Received: 23/01/2026
Respondent: Linton Parish Council
Linton Parish Council (LPC) supports development that aligns with the local area's character, advocating for lower density and height of properties, particularly near existing buildings.
LPC emphasises the need for housing designs that are appropriate for a village setting, rather than those suited for urban environments.
Heritage buildings should be protected from being overshadowed by new developments, requiring careful and sympathetic consideration.
Traffic management from the development must ensure that the A1307 is not adversely affected, preventing traffic congestion towards Cambridge.
LPC expresses concerns regarding the archaeological significance of the Grange Farm site.
• In relation to design and density Linton Parish Council (LPC) would favour development, which is in keeping with the local area, with lower density, lower height of properties especially when adjacent to existing buildings.
• Consideration must be given to building appropriate housing for a village location as opposed to designs more suited to towns and cities.
• Heritage Buildings must be afforded protection from being engulfed by new dwellings and sympathetic consideration must be applied.
• Traffic from the development should be managed in such a way that the A1307 is not impacted and traffic heading towards Cambridge is not left stationary along the A1307 by Abington
• LPC raise concerns regarding the archaeological importance of the Grange Farm site.
Object
Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation
Policy S/DE: Defined development extents
Representation ID: 201670
Received: 23/01/2026
Respondent: Linton Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
• The “Defined Development Extents” (settlement boundary) for Linton should revert to that used in the current local plan – it should NOT include the Horseheath Road and Bartlow Road developments as these were developments that resulted from the lack of a Local Plan being in place in 2015-2018. (related to Policy S/DE)
The development boundary for Linton should not include the recent Bartlow Road (Trout Beck) and Horseheath Road (Michaelotts, Spur Road, Barrows Way) developments. These were developments in the open countryside which were approved when the Local Plan was out of date. Please revert to the previous settlements boundary as per the draft Linton and Hildersham Neighbourhood Plan
• The “Defined Development Extents” (settlement boundary) for Linton should revert to that used in the current local plan – it should NOT include the Horseheath Road and Bartlow Road developments as these were developments that resulted from the lack of a Local Plan being in place in 2015-2018. (related to Policy S/DE)
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation
Policy BG/PO: Protecting open spaces
Representation ID: 201671
Received: 23/01/2026
Respondent: Linton Parish Council
• Leadwell Meadows/Pocket Park should be recognised as Protected Open Space (related to Policy BG/PO)
• Leadwell Meadows/Pocket Park should be recognised as Protected Open Space (related to Policy BG/PO)
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Local Plan for consultation
Summary of the Greater Cambridge Local Plan
Representation ID: 201672
Received: 23/01/2026
Respondent: Linton Parish Council
• Linton Parish Council (LPC) are broadly in favour of the principles included in the draft Local Plan.
• LPC are in favour of avoiding the spread of development throughout local villages as thus smaller scale development would fail to provide adequate infrastructure and services.
• Linton Parish Council (LPC) are broadly in favour of the principles included in the draft Local Plan.
• LPC are in favour of avoiding the spread of development throughout local villages as thus smaller scale development would fail to provide adequate infrastructure and services.