Draft Cambridge Biomedical Campus Supplementary Planning Document

SPD doesn’t seem to celebrate any of the positives since fist allocation for development in the 2006 local plan. For example, there is no reference to examples of the public art, delivered by a very sophisticated City Public Art Delivery Plan and administered by a campus Public Art Steering Group that Nadine Black was part of.
photography isnt fantastic quality and doesn’t feel equitable or balanced for such a significant planning document. 1000 Discovery Drive which might provide some balance and is significant as it’s the first speculative development on the biomedical campus with open house amenity.

2.8 Is the childrens Hospital actually u/c or were the works enabling works?

3.7 isnt it wider than this to include clinical expansion as well eg phase 2 land share for NHS.
3.18 Is "Expansion" an occupier?
3.20 cafe operator is Stir.
3.23 reads as though AZ and RPH are on Phase 2. they are Phase 1.
3.27 Piecemeal is unfair - it is "Phased."

4.10 isnt giving regard to amount of green coming with new plots on commercial phase 2 . its the highest quality, coordinated that means the green courts link to provide necklace of attractive green spaces as phase2 gets built out.
4c1.1 some acknowledgement this needs balancing with need for ground floor space for vibrationally sensitive R&D work to be undertaken.
4c2.4 needs to recognise unique importance back up generators have to R&D users. They are fundamental campus infrastructure for regulatory/legal compliance in some life science operations.
4f.1.3 this gives impression of "spare" land for meanwhile uses and that isnt correct.

5.5 i dont believe this is appropriate for a healthcare campus. For example we have 14 and 16 wheel BOC tankers delivering gasses to various users. this clause poses a real health and safety challenge. Perhaps it has a place in Phase 3 and 4 when uses could be at the edge of the scheme.

3.7 isnt it wider than this to include clinical expansion as well eg phase 2 land share for NHS.
3.18 Is "Expansion" an occupier?
3.20 cafe operator is Stir.
3.23 reads as though AZ and RPH are on Phase 2. they are Phase 1.
3.27 Piecemeal is unfair - it is "Phased."

3.7 isnt it wider than this to include clinical expansion as well eg phase 2 land share for NHS.
3.18 Is "Expansion" an occupier?
3.20 cafe operator is Stir.
3.23 reads as though AZ and RPH are on Phase 2. they are Phase 1.
3.27 Piecemeal is unfair - it is "Phased."

3.7 isnt it wider than this to include clinical expansion as well eg phase 2 land share for NHS.
3.18 Is "Expansion" an occupier?
3.20 cafe operator is Stir.
3.23 reads as though AZ and RPH are on Phase 2. they are Phase 1.
3.27 Piecemeal is unfair - it is "Phased."

3.7 isnt it wider than this to include clinical expansion as well eg phase 2 land share for NHS.
3.18 Is "Expansion" an occupier?
3.20 cafe operator is Stir.
3.23 reads as though AZ and RPH are on Phase 2. they are Phase 1.
3.27 Piecemeal is unfair - it is "Phased."