Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Search representations
Results for Cambridge Past, Present and Future search
New searchComment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Chapter 5: Green Infrastructure
Representation ID: 200171
Received: 08/01/2025
Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future
This approach to getting investment in GI is supported. However, we need to ensure that the money is sufficient to manage the sites in the long term and not just for the first 15 years. Investing the funds in an endowment which provides a return sufficient for long term maintenance of the land should be considered.
This approach to getting investment in GI is supported. However, we need to ensure that the money is sufficient to manage the sites in the long term and not just for the first 15 years. Investing the funds in an endowment which provides a return sufficient for long term maintenance of the land should be considered.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Chapter 6: Biodiversity
Representation ID: 200172
Received: 08/01/2025
Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future
The SPD appears to focus on BNG yet there might be other areas that S106 should be used for to deliver other biodiversity benefits and mitigation which should be referenced in the SPD.
The SPD appears to focus on BNG yet there might be other areas that S106 should be used for to deliver other biodiversity benefits and mitigation which should be referenced in the SPD.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Chapter 12: Public Art
Representation ID: 200173
Received: 08/01/2025
Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future
The delivery of public art by developers has not been successful in Cambridge and has led to controversy. A better use of a financial contribution would be towards improved and new cultural venues to cater for the growing population of Cambridge.
The delivery of public art by developers has not been successful in Cambridge and has led to controversy. A better use of a financial contribution would be towards improved and new cultural venues to cater for the growing population of Cambridge.
Comment
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Chapter 10: Transport and Highways
Representation ID: 200174
Received: 08/01/2025
Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future
The Transport section should provide strong hooks for requesting money for contribution towards sustainable transport infrastructure which is above and beyond that necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms. Hertfordshire CC have calculated a sum of £10,000 per dwelling.
The Transport section should provide strong hooks for requesting money for contribution towards sustainable transport infrastructure which is above and beyond that necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms. Hertfordshire CC have calculated a sum of £10,000 per dwelling.
Support
Draft Greater Cambridge Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
Chapter 1: Introduction
Representation ID: 200175
Received: 08/01/2025
Respondent: Cambridge Past, Present and Future
We are supportive of this SPD for the reasons set out in paragraph 1.3
We are supportive of this SPD for the reasons set out in paragraph 1.3
