Draft Bourn Airfield Supplementary Planning Document - June 2019

Search representations

Results for Cambridge Cycling Campaign search

New search New search

Object

Draft Bourn Airfield Supplementary Planning Document - June 2019

5. Creating the Place - Section 1: A Well Connected Place

Representation ID: 168351

Received: 28/07/2019

Respondent: Cambridge Cycling Campaign

Representation Summary:

Fix B STRATEGIC WALKING AND CYCLING CONNECTIONS

Contradiction between 'A shared pedestrian and cycle route' and 'Segregated pedestrian and cycle routes'. It is unclear which is meant where. Delete the word 'shared' and instead replace it with 'segregated'.

Add: 'Cycle routes along urban streets must be adjacent to a separate, dedicated footway. Away from streets, cycle routes should be built with a separate, dedicated footway unless it can be convincingly demonstrated that pedestrian usage will be sufficiently low to allow sharing. For design and construction, use standards found in manuals such as Designing for Cycle Traffic by John Parkin.'

Add: 'Strategic walking and cycling routes must have continuity and priority over motor traffic at side-road crossings and driveways.'

Add: 'Routes must be fully accessible to people with disabilities who are using mobility aids such as mobility scooters, adapted cycles and wheelchairs.'

Object

Draft Bourn Airfield Supplementary Planning Document - June 2019

5. Creating the Place - Section 1: A Well Connected Place

Representation ID: 168352

Received: 28/07/2019

Respondent: Cambridge Cycling Campaign

Representation Summary:

Fix C CAMBOURNE TO CAMBRIDGE HIGH QUALITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT ROUTE AND STOPS

Oppose: 'combined walking and cycling path with a minimum 3m width'. Segregated combined walking and cycling path must be at least 4.5m wide. Proposed minimum path width of 3m is much too narrow for segregation, because it would allow only 1.5m for the footway and 1.5m for a single direction cycleway, without enough space for a bi-directional cycleway.

Add: 'There must be a safe buffer between the busway and the cycleway of at least 2m grass verge.'

'There must be safe and convenient crossing points designed with cycling-friendly curvature such that people walking and cycling approach the crossing in a direction perpendicular to the movement of buses, with clear and very long visibility splays in both directions, and ideally with a 3m-deep refuge island between the bus lanes.'

'No chicanes or guardrails are to be used, because these block visibility, exclude some people with disabilities from using the path, pose an obstacle that will cause injuries, create a dangerous distraction from moving buses, and cause conflict between users of the path.'

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.