Cottenham Neighbourhood Plan - submission consultation

Object

Representation ID: 167647

Received: 25/03/2019

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

The policy approach of the Neighbourhood Plan for housing delivery and the identification of sites for residential development is unsound.

Object

Representation ID: 167648

Received: 25/03/2019

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Policy COH/1-1: Landscape character

The weight granted to the preservation of landscape setting is inappropriate. Note context of the appeal site decision at Rampton Road.

Object

Representation ID: 167649

Received: 25/03/2019

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Policy COH/2-1: Development Framework

The proposed development framework of Cottenham does not take into account defensible features and assets. The site at Broad Lane should be included.

Object

Representation ID: 167650

Received: 25/03/2019

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Policy COH/2-2 Large site design

The Neighbourhood Plan should not overly constrain the delivery of important large sites through stringent policy requirements.

Object

Representation ID: 167651

Received: 25/03/2019

Respondent: Southern & Regional Developments

Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy Ltd

Housing sites being proposed by landowner for inclusion in the neighbourhood plan in the Broad Lane area.
1. Land north of Kingfisher Way
2 Land off Kingfisher Way
3. Land west of Broad Lane

Concern that the plan is not meeting housing need for Cottenham. Sites were assessed for housing by AECOM during plan making.