4.4.11

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Object

Grafton Area of Major Change SPD 2017

Representation ID: 31679

Received: 27/09/2017

Respondent: Rachel Engler

Representation Summary:

I believe "the opportunity to allow additional height within the SPD area, subject to acceptable design and assessment" is too vague and subjective. Height should be limited to the court house height. Period. If restrictions aren't well articulated they can't be enforced. We end up with another CB1.

Modulation and variety to the roofscape and streetscape is a very good idea. Recent developments have tended to be identa-kit boxes.

Full text:

I believe "the opportunity to allow additional height within the SPD area, subject to acceptable design and assessment" is too vague and subjective. Height should be limited to the court house height. Period. If restrictions aren't well articulated they can't be enforced. We end up with another CB1.

Modulation and variety to the roofscape and streetscape is a very good idea. Recent developments have tended to be identa-kit boxes.