Figure 28: Transport and Access

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

Representation ID: 31038

Received: 21/07/2016

Respondent: Cambridge Association of Architects

Representation Summary:

This diagram should provide hierarchy of streets, not only traffic.
While vehicular traffic may be even on both north/south routes, it is highly important to spell out the difference between the west route along the coach houses (a mews scale street) and the route to the east, along the 'Eagle Foundry Walk' green space (which will carry the character of a more prominent 'boulevard')
Lines should be separated by thickness or colour to highlight the differences.

Full text:

This diagram should provide hierarchy of streets, not only traffic.
While vehicular traffic may be even on both north/south routes, it is highly important to spell out the difference between the west route along the coach houses (a mews scale street) and the route to the east, along the 'Eagle Foundry Walk' green space (which will carry the character of a more prominent 'boulevard')
Lines should be separated by thickness or colour to highlight the differences.

Support

Mill Road Depot Draft Planning and Development Brief SPD

Representation ID: 31172

Received: 22/07/2016

Respondent: Cllr Richard Robertson

Representation Summary:

The road and pathway layout in the Site Framework Plan is replicated in the Transport and Access plan (Fig 28). Both plans show the Chisholm Trail going round the edge of the site - as it should.

Full text:

See attachment