4.6.1
Comment
The New Museums Site Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)
Representation ID: 30640
Received: 12/08/2015
Respondent: Historic England
Agent: Historic England
This states that access to the site is currently very poor. However, I question this and would suggest that what is very poor is the permeability of the site If you compare plan 10, which illustrates the current access points, with map 13, which shows the proposed access points there is no change. I therefore suggest that the opening sentence of paragraph 4.6.1 reads: 'Access into the site is currently poor and permeability through the site is very poor, as highlight by Plan 10.'
This states that access to the site is currently very poor. However, I question this and would suggest that what is very poor is the permeability of the site If you compare plan 10, which illustrates the current access points, with map 13, which shows the proposed access points there is no change. I therefore suggest that the opening sentence of paragraph 4.6.1 reads: 'Access into the site is currently poor and permeability through the site is very poor, as highlight by Plan 10.'