Question 39b
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29291
Received: 10/12/2014
Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited
Yes.
Yes.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29307
Received: 11/12/2014
Respondent: Stanton Shallcross
The more available cycle parking, the more attractive this area will be to cycle to. Fighting for spaces is already very off-putting to those trying to get to the city centre station, so let's not make the same mistake here.
The more available cycle parking, the more attractive this area will be to cycle to. Fighting for spaces is already very off-putting to those trying to get to the city centre station, so let's not make the same mistake here.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29340
Received: 16/12/2014
Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell
Providing even greater amounts of cycle parking that are expected to be used seems an appropriate way to encourage people to use cycles. If you are hoping that some workers will arrive by train and then cycle to locations on the Science Park, then you need to provide sufficient secure cycle storage to enable people to leave their cycles at the station overnight and at weekends.
Providing even greater amounts of cycle parking that are expected to be used seems an appropriate way to encourage people to use cycles. If you are hoping that some workers will arrive by train and then cycle to locations on the Science Park, then you need to provide sufficient secure cycle storage to enable people to leave their cycles at the station overnight and at weekends.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29579
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
With cycle racks that are not like those towers at Cambridge Station!
With cycle racks that are not like those towers at Cambridge Station!
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29707
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
Brookgate object to higher cycle parking standards as the current standards are sufficient to deal with the likely demand for cycle parking in areas with good cycle infrastructure and connectivity.
Brookgate object to higher cycle parking standards as the current standards are sufficient to deal with the likely demand for cycle parking in areas with good cycle infrastructure and connectivity.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29828
Received: 31/01/2015
Respondent: Mr David Collier
Since this development aims to achieve higher cycling levels, certainly a higher standard of cycle parking will be needed. It would be absurd to create a pleasant cycling environment but not require there to be enough spaces for all potential users.
Since this development aims to achieve higher cycling levels, certainly a higher standard of cycle parking will be needed. It would be absurd to create a pleasant cycling environment but not require there to be enough spaces for all potential users.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29940
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
Cycle parking provision at least in line with standards will be required. However, further more detailed analysis will be needed on cycle mode share and targets to determine an appropriate level that seeks to maximise cycle access to the area. This is likely to confirm a level of provision in excess of standards given the high levels of non-car mode split likely to be required but as noted this will require further, more detailed, analysis.
Increased cycle parking is in line with increasing modal share to walking and Cycling, and Active Transport is a key wider determinant of health.
The ability to park a cycle in a safe, secure, and convenient location is a key aspect of encouraging and supporting travel by bike. The County Council considers that cycle parking provision at least in line with standards will be required. However, further more detailed analysis will be needed on cycle mode share and targets to determine an appropriate level that seeks to maximise cycle access to the area. This is likely to confirm a level of provision in excess of standards given the high levels of non-car mode split likely to be required but as noted this will require further, more detailed, analysis.
Increased cycle parking is in line with increasing modal share to walking and Cycling, and Active Transport is a key wider determinant of health.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30069
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
New cycleways will encourage more cycling and therefore higher level of provision likely.
New cycleways will encourage more cycling and therefore higher level of provision likely.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30203
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
Consideration to be given to higher standard to reflect sustainability of location.
Consideration to be given to higher standard to reflect sustainability of location.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30232
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Urban&Civic Ltd
Agent: David Lock Associates
Option B (Higher Standards) is supported because this would be more likely to maximise the potential for employees and visitors to travel by bike, for example between Waterbeach New Town and the CNFE Area.
Option B (Higher Standards) is supported because this would be more likely to maximise the potential for employees and visitors to travel by bike, for example between Waterbeach New Town and the CNFE Area.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30428
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Tom McKeown
The Campaign supports Option B: higher cycle parking standard across the whole area to reflect the highly sustainable location. High-quality, easily accessible and available cycle parking throughout the site is entirely appropriate for enabling high cycling use at all destinations - employment, residential and the station. The Campaign also recommends secure, covered cycle parking in residential areas as these reduce theft and deterioration of residents' bikes.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30609
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
Yes.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.