Question 35c

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29352

Received: 18/12/2014

Respondent: Dr Alan Mayes

Representation Summary:

I support using this opportunity to minimise car usage.

Full text:

I support using this opportunity to minimise car usage.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29693

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Realistic and achievable targets should be set in order to determine the likely transport impact of the CNFE and to what extent travel planning and transport improvements are able to mitigate the impact. Modal share targets should be produced to inform the development of a package of phased transport measures required to achieve the targets.

Full text:

Realistic and achievable targets should be set in order to determine the likely transport impact of the CNFE and to what extent travel planning and transport improvements are able to mitigate the impact. Modal share targets should be produced to inform the development of a package of phased transport measures required to achieve the targets.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29795

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

It is inappropriate to set such targets in policy before the precise mix of uses is known and understood.

Full text:

It is inappropriate to set such targets in policy before the precise mix of uses is known and understood.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29924

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

All options will require more detailed transport assessment work to understand the transport implications, across all modes, of the proposals including their inter-relationship with emerging proposals under development by the County Council as part of the City Deal programme. Although this is true of all options, this is particularly the case for those that propose higher levels of development which might require significant transport intervention to ensure that transport impacts are not severe. This applies to both the local networks (walk, cycle, bus, and highway) and also the strategic road (i.e.: Highways Agency) and rail (i.e.: Network Rail) networks.

Full text:

All options will require more detailed transport assessment work to understand the transport implications, across all modes, of the proposals including their inter-relationship with emerging proposals under development by the County Council as part of the City Deal programme. Although this is true of all options, this is particularly the case for those that propose higher levels of development which might require significant transport intervention to ensure that transport impacts are not severe. This applies to both the local networks (walk, cycle, bus, and highway) and also the strategic road (i.e.: Highways Agency) and rail (i.e.: Network Rail) networks.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30040

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP

Agent: Beacon Planning

Representation Summary:

In the absence of any information about traffic generation it is not possible to set targets.

Full text:

In the absence of any information about traffic generation it is not possible to set targets.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30339

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

I don't think a local plan such as this should get itself involved in such matters apart not constraining any particular form of transport.

Full text:

I don't think a local plan such as this should get itself involved in such matters apart not constraining any particular form of transport.