Question 30e
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29687
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
No further comment.
No further comment.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29790
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
None.
None.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29915
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30185
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
Flexibility is required at this stage
Flexibility is required at this stage
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30284
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Turnstone Estates Limited
Agent: Carter Jonas
Turnstone does not immediately see the rationale for student accommodation at CNFE. Typically student housing is provided more centrally in Cambridge, making it extremely accessible for the institutions attended by the students. CNFE should be focused on employment uses and other complementary uses that will aid the overall sustainability of the development.
Turnstone does not immediately see the rationale for student accommodation at CNFE. Typically student housing is provided more centrally in Cambridge, making it extremely accessible for the institutions attended by the students. CNFE should be focused on employment uses and other complementary uses that will aid the overall sustainability of the development.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30601
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30657
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd
This must be as a complementary use with the focus being on employment and research and development uses, and any large scale developments should not be permitted.
See attached document
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30681
Received: 01/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Lisa Buchholz
There's too much student housing in Cambridge and would not support further student housing here.
See attached document