Question 29c

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29410

Received: 09/01/2015

Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney

Representation Summary:

I am sorry but I do not understand this. I support the idea that inexpensive accommodation needs to be provided. Does this option mean there could be council houses? If so, I agree that could be a very good option.

Full text:

I am sorry but I do not understand this. I support the idea that inexpensive accommodation needs to be provided. Does this option mean there could be council houses? If so, I agree that could be a very good option.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29570

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

It is essential there is affordable housing only - ideally with council house included but this could be wishful thinking

Full text:

It is essential there is affordable housing only - ideally with council house included but this could be wishful thinking

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29682

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

The ability of PRS schemes to create quality places to live cannot be doubted, it is no different to any development in the built environment. It needs a clear brief, good design, delivery and collaborative working to make it successful architecturally and in urban design terms. Many authorities are developing PRS design guides to assist developers. The authorities may wish to follow a similar route, producing guidance in association with the developer as part of the AAP but the ULI UK residential council has recently produced "Build to Rent, A Best Practice Guide" which represents significant expertise in this area.

Full text:

The ability of PRS schemes to create quality places to live cannot be doubted, it is no different to any development in the built environment. It needs a clear brief, good design, delivery and collaborative working to make it successful architecturally and in urban design terms. Many authorities are developing PRS design guides to assist developers. The authorities may wish to follow a similar route, producing guidance in association with the developer as part of the AAP but the ULI UK residential council has recently produced "Build to Rent, A Best Practice Guide" which represents significant expertise in this area.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29910

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads, and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Full text:

If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads, and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30178

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

Allow flexible approach

Full text:

Allow flexible approach

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30217

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Urban&Civic Ltd

Agent: David Lock Associates

Representation Summary:

It is agreed that private market accommodation could play a greater role in delivering future housing needs in the Cambridge area. Whilst the intention of Option B is understood, it is important to allow the market to deliver this form of housing in response to demand. The range of planning policies allow for both the mix and the environmental conditions to be managed through the planning application process without additional polices in the AAP.

Full text:

It is agreed that private market accommodation could play a greater role in delivering future housing needs in the Cambridge area. Whilst the intention of Option B is understood, it is important to allow the market to deliver this form of housing in response to demand. The range of planning policies allow for both the mix and the environmental conditions to be managed through the planning application process without additional polices in the AAP.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30596

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Don't care.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.