Question 26b
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29245
Received: 08/12/2014
Respondent: Ben Cofield
I would like to see a hotel here, or 2 hotels, and consider a mixed-used area essential. We should most certainly consider conference accommodation, as people would more than likely use this hotel than central ones, meaning less traffic and easier access for residents of East Anglia.
I would like to see a hotel here, or 2 hotels, and consider a mixed-used area essential. We should most certainly consider conference accommodation, as people would more than likely use this hotel than central ones, meaning less traffic and easier access for residents of East Anglia.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29443
Received: 17/01/2015
Respondent: Nicky Morland
Important to provide hotel facilities in this development
Important to provide hotel facilities in this development
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29565
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
Should be included
Should be included
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29675
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
Support, however subject to viability conference facilities could also be provided. The development of the new railway station and regeneration of the wider CNFE area will create a demand for a hotel in this location. The land adjacent to the new station provides a sustainable and accessible location for a hotel to serve business users associated with the large number of existing and proposed businesses in the CNFE area. The proposed vision for the CNFE states that the area will embrace modern commercial business needs and ensure that the new area is supported with the right social and community infrastructure.
Support, however subject to viability conference facilities could also be provided. The development of the new railway station and regeneration of the wider CNFE area will create a demand for a hotel in this location. The land adjacent to the new station provides a sustainable and accessible location for a hotel to serve business users associated with the large number of existing and proposed businesses in the CNFE area. The proposed vision for the CNFE states that the area will embrace modern commercial business needs and ensure that the new area is supported with the right social and community infrastructure.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29783
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
An area of land close to the railway station should be provided with dual use allocation of either residential or hotel. If the market demands are great enough the hotel will be developed. The provision of a conference centre could be integrated into the hotel as an ancillary use.
An area of land close to the railway station should be provided with dual use allocation of either residential or hotel. If the market demands are great enough the hotel will be developed. The provision of a conference centre could be integrated into the hotel as an ancillary use.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29902
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
If a hotel is provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
Support either option B or C but may depend on whether development of a hotel at the entrance to the Science Park goes ahead. Any provision allocation in the AAP needs to be kept flexible if no demand materialises.
If a hotel is provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
Support either option B or C but may depend on whether development of a hotel at the entrance to the Science Park goes ahead. Any provision allocation in the AAP needs to be kept flexible if no demand materialises.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30030
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Would support business uses on CNFE and Science Park.
Would support business uses on CNFE and Science Park.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30169
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30324
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
I support Option C.
I support Option C.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30479
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd
TCE support the provision of a hotel and/or conference facilities within the mixed-use development of land around the proposed new railway station, on the basis that this would be a supporting use with the focus remaining on employment and office floor space.
See attached document
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30592
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
Yes.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.