Question 24c

Showing comments and forms 1 to 11 of 11

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29442

Received: 17/01/2015

Respondent: Nicky Morland

Representation Summary:

Support since Cambridge needs accommodation especially for key workers but with the access to the accommodation which directly from Milton Road. This will reduce traffic in Green End Road and Nuffield Road

Full text:

Support since Cambridge needs accommodation especially for key workers but with the access to the accommodation which directly from Milton Road. This will reduce traffic in Green End Road and Nuffield Road

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29518

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Hazel Smith

Representation Summary:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Full text:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29561

Received: 23/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson

Representation Summary:

I agree

Full text:

I agree

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29610

Received: 27/01/2015

Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam

Representation Summary:

Good location for residential accommodation.

Full text:

Good location for residential accommodation.

Comment

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29672

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Brookgate

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

No comment.

Full text:

No comment.

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29779

Received: 30/01/2015

Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Object for reasons stated in 24a.

Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.

Full text:

Object for reasons stated in 24a.

Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 29898

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council

Representation Summary:

Support this option in order to provide a better environment for residents in the Nuffield road area.

Full text:

Support this option in order to provide a better environment for residents in the Nuffield road area.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30163

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Grosvenor Developments

Agent: AECOM

Representation Summary:

No additional comment

Full text:

No additional comment

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30321

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Coulson Building Group

Representation Summary:

We support Option B, it would result in better zoning.

Full text:

We support Option B, it would result in better zoning.

Support

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30399

Received: 04/02/2015

Respondent: Milton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

Full text:

See attached document

Object

Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 30588

Received: 19/01/2015

Respondent: Silke Scheler

Representation Summary:

Object.

Full text:

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.