Question 24c
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29442
Received: 17/01/2015
Respondent: Nicky Morland
Support since Cambridge needs accommodation especially for key workers but with the access to the accommodation which directly from Milton Road. This will reduce traffic in Green End Road and Nuffield Road
Support since Cambridge needs accommodation especially for key workers but with the access to the accommodation which directly from Milton Road. This will reduce traffic in Green End Road and Nuffield Road
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29518
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Hazel Smith
Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.
Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29561
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
I agree
I agree
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29610
Received: 27/01/2015
Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam
Good location for residential accommodation.
Good location for residential accommodation.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29672
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
No comment.
No comment.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29779
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Object for reasons stated in 24a.
Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.
Object for reasons stated in 24a.
Response to Question 24a: Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29898
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
Support this option in order to provide a better environment for residents in the Nuffield road area.
Support this option in order to provide a better environment for residents in the Nuffield road area.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30163
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30321
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
We support Option B, it would result in better zoning.
We support Option B, it would result in better zoning.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30399
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30588
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
Object.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.