Question 23b
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29276
Received: 10/12/2014
Respondent: Management Process Systems Limited
Let's integrate with the wider ecoconmic area.
Let's integrate with the wider ecoconmic area.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29332
Received: 16/12/2014
Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell
Appropriate in the wider context.
Appropriate in the wider context.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29404
Received: 09/01/2015
Respondent: Ms Anne Swinney
The whole area should have similar policies.
The whole area should have similar policies.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29515
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Hazel Smith
CSP is to be redeveloped and the whole area should be considered together. The environment of CSP's early phases with its now-mature trees should be treated carefully, so as not to lose the 'Park' concept.
CSP is to be redeveloped and the whole area should be considered together. The environment of CSP's early phases with its now-mature trees should be treated carefully, so as not to lose the 'Park' concept.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29560
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
Yes
Yes
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29668
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
Proposed Submission South Cambridgeshire Local Plan Policy E/1 provides sufficient support for employment development and redevelopment to enable the continued expansion and intensification of high technology R & D clusters in the Science Park. There is no requirement for further policy guidance which would risk complicating proceedings for developers, potentially hindering the continued successful development of the Science Park.
Proposed Submission South Cambridgeshire Local Plan Policy E/1 provides sufficient support for employment development and redevelopment to enable the continued expansion and intensification of high technology R & D clusters in the Science Park. There is no requirement for further policy guidance which would risk complicating proceedings for developers, potentially hindering the continued successful development of the Science Park.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29775
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
The intensification/densification of sites within the Cambridge Science Park should be judged against existing and emerging Local Plan policies and other material such as NPPF. The intensification of uses within the science park is a current and ongoing dynamic and the need to provide guidance is now. To delay providing guidance by placing it within this AAP would be too late. The Council should seek to address these issues through the Draft Local Plan which could be complemented by Supplementary Planning Guidance which could be relatively quick to produce, if it is considered necessary at all.
The intensification/densification of sites within the Cambridge Science Park should be judged against existing and emerging Local Plan policies and other material such as NPPF. The intensification of uses within the science park is a current and ongoing dynamic and the need to provide guidance is now. To delay providing guidance by placing it within this AAP would be too late. The Council should seek to address these issues through the Draft Local Plan which could be complemented by Supplementary Planning Guidance which could be relatively quick to produce, if it is considered necessary at all.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29810
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: Trinity College
Agent: Bidwells
The Cambridge Science Park (CSP) is an existing entity and is very different to a regeneration development. The bespoke policies being derived for the CNFE area through site-specific studies should not, and cannot, be so readily applied to CSP.
Trinity College (as owners and custodians of the CSP) is supportive of CNFE but there is no need, nor is it appropriate, to apply policies that are emerging as bespoke for CNFE as blanket policies to a wider area.
The Cambridge Science Park (CSP) is an existing entity and is very different to a regeneration development. The bespoke policies being derived for the CNFE area through site-specific studies should not, and cannot, be so readily applied to CSP.
Trinity College (as owners and custodians of the CSP) is supportive of CNFE but there is no need, nor is it appropriate, to apply policies that are emerging as bespoke for CNFE as blanket policies to a wider area.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29895
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
Support in order to protect the Cambridge Science Park from possible conversions and retain its essential character and attractiveness.
Support in order to protect the Cambridge Science Park from possible conversions and retain its essential character and attractiveness.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30026
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Provides level playing field across both sites.
Provides level playing field across both sites.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30157
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30318
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
The plan should not interfere with something that is already very successful.
The plan should not interfere with something that is already very successful.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30396
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Milton Parish Council
CSP is to be redeveloped and the whole area should be considered together. The environment of CSP's early phases with its now-mature trees should be treated carefully, so as not to lose the 'Park' concept.
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30653
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd
As set out above we support the inclusion of the Science Park within the AAP area. However, the issues related to the Science Park are not unique and there is no requirement for additional policy guidance for Cambridge Science Park. Site specific policies may be required to control the type and quality of development on opportunity sites within the AAP area.
See attached document