Question 38a
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29337
Received: 16/12/2014
Respondent: Dr Roger Sewell
The car parking restrictions in appendix L8 of the referenced documents are far too tight - see what has happened about car parking in Orchard Park.
The car parking restrictions in appendix L8 of the referenced documents are far too tight - see what has happened about car parking in Orchard Park.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29702
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
Brookgate support the use of car parking standards across the whole area that are more restrictive than the car parking standards policy set by the Cambridge City Council car parking standards, to reflect the highly sustainable location. The current policy however forms a useful starting point in discussions over car parking levels.
Brookgate support the use of car parking standards across the whole area that are more restrictive than the car parking standards policy set by the Cambridge City Council car parking standards, to reflect the highly sustainable location. The current policy however forms a useful starting point in discussions over car parking levels.
Comment
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29935
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
Car parking provision has a strong relationship to traffic generation and consideration will need to be given to balancing operational needs of the site, with encouraging high levels of access by non-car means and supporting sustainable transport, thus ensuring that any residual impacts on the highway network are not severe. The County Council therefore considers that more detailed consideration of parking numbers, and approach to parking provision, will be required including detailed assessment of non-car trip patterns, mode split targets, the relationship to standards, potential for shared use of parking across different land uses, and impacts of traffic on networks
As noted above, car parking provision has a strong relationship to traffic generation and careful consideration will need to be given to balancing operational needs of the site, with encouraging high levels of access by non-car means and supporting sustainable transport access to the site, and thus ensuring that any residual impacts on the highway network are not severe. The County Council therefore considers that more detailed consideration of parking numbers, and the approach to parking provision, will be required including inter-alia detailed assessment of non-car trip patterns, mode split targets, the relationship to standards, the potential for shared use of parking across different land uses, and impacts of vehicular traffic on the highway networks
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30055
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Beacon Planning
Parking standards should not be more onerous than in the rest of the city especially given the location on the edge of the settlement.
Parking standards should not be more onerous than in the rest of the city especially given the location on the edge of the settlement.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30199
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30346
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
This is the least worst Option.
This is the least worst Option.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30484
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd
TCE do not support a restriction in car parking standards or further cycle parking spaces. TCE support Option A for the CNFE AAP to include CCC adopted car parking standards and cycle parking standards.
See attached document