Question 30a
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29571
Received: 23/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sasha Wilson
No more please
No more please
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29614
Received: 27/01/2015
Respondent: Cllr Anna Bradnam
I would support Option A or B (up to 20% student housing but no more.)
I would support Option A or B (up to 20% student housing but no more.)
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29683
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Brookgate
Agent: Bidwells
The market has expressed an interest in the provision of student housing in the CNFE area and this need should be accommodated.
The market has expressed an interest in the provision of student housing in the CNFE area and this need should be accommodated.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29788
Received: 30/01/2015
Respondent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd
Paragraph 9.28 specifically states that the market has expressed an interest in student accommodation. Failure to acknowledge clear market signals does not accord with the advice of the NPPF.
Paragraph 9.28 specifically states that the market has expressed an interest in student accommodation. Failure to acknowledge clear market signals does not accord with the advice of the NPPF.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 29911
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridgeshire County Council
If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
Support especially as the need for student accommodation in the area has yet to be made.
If housing (of any type) is to be provided it should be in a location where amenity issues from the Water Recycling Centre, aggregate railheads and existing and planned waste uses will not arise and / or can be satisfactorily mitigated.
Support especially as the need for student accommodation in the area has yet to be made.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30179
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Grosvenor Developments
Agent: AECOM
No additional comment
No additional comment
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30330
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Coulson Building Group
It is too far/remote from the Universities and substantial facilities.
It is too far/remote from the Universities and substantial facilities.
Support
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30517
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Cambridge City Council
Option A. If there is evidence of demand for student accommodation in this location or some of the proposals for the CNFE create such demand, then it would be sensible to make such provision. It is considered that as there are no educational institutions in the immediate vicinity, there would seem to be limited demand for student accommodation in this location. This location could also leave students isolated as there are limited facilities available unless there is significant provision on site within the AAP area.
See attached document
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30597
Received: 19/01/2015
Respondent: Silke Scheler
No.
I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.
*******************
9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.
Object
Cambridge Northern Fringe East AAP - Issues and Options
Representation ID: 30656
Received: 02/02/2015
Respondent: Indigo Planning Ltd
TCE broadly support the inclusion of student accommodation in the CNFE area; however, this must be as a complementary use with the focus being on employment and research and development uses, and any large scale developments should not be permitted.
See attached document