Question 24a

Full support, IF access is from Milton Road, thus the guided bus (which should not be guided after Milton Road) would travel on the same road as normal traffic, up to the estate, and then onwards on a normal road via controlled bollards. A right hand filter lane would need to be added here, which should allow enough time for 3 or 4 vehicles to turn right, after the city-bound traffic is stopped. If access is as is the it should be turned into residential accommodation, but as there is nowhere else for these units to go, please create an access road from Milton Road for lorries at least. The current access road could be only for cars, cyclists and pedestrians, or close completely.

Given a choice between residential accommodation and more employment, the preference should be for residential accommodation, as more employment just boosts the need for more housing even further.

Good environmentally, suitable for residential, accessed from Green End Road.

No comment.

Option A would result in no change to the current land use provisions. This is supported on the basis that the industrial land uses are important to the City functionality and that there are no clear agreements to demonstrate that their relocation to within a short distance can be achieved

No comment

No additional comment

Support Option B.

See attached document

See attached document

I find all proposed options to be too restricted with the use of space. A mix of residential use, offices and industry would be preferable to give it a more natural feel. For example, leave the Nuffield Road industrial area and more residential use development further north. Also consider a more modular approach that allows to develop toward a future goal, but doesn't depend on things (like moving the water recycling centre) from the get go.

*******************


9) Objective 3 shouldn't get highest priority.
14) 11-13 are too divided in to use of space, a more natural mix of residential, offices and industrial would be better. Also, re-use as much of what is already there as possible.
15, 16, 17) No clear explanations, which means meaning will be defined later.
18b) Would destroy the feeling of that part of the city.
23c) Science Park should be independent.
24d) This should only be considered if there are no other options. Moving the businesses will be expesive, so leave them there and build the residential area somewhere else.
30e) Student accomodation should be integrated so they won't all be in the same area.
36) Whatever makes best sense for transport at the current stage of the project.