Waterbeach New Town SPD

Showing comments and forms 91 to 120 of 357

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167364

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Shelley Mason

Representation Summary:

6.4 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
Pressure on existing village facilities during the initial phases of developments
Safeguarding transport in the existing village

Full text:

Summary
Overall number of dwellings
Pressure on existing village facilities during the initial phases of developments
Safeguarding transport in the existing village
Green spaces
The A10

Submission
While I understand the rationale for redeveloping the barracks area, I am not in favour of the adjoining area leading to the east. It is far from clear how the two developers will work together.

The Fenland nature of the area should be retained.

The Local Plan references 8-9 thousand units - so development should be contained within these limits.

What provision is there to ensure that existing village facilities already under severe pressure (roads, school intake, doctor's surgery) will cope before we trigger points on the new development are reached?

Access including construction traffic, should be off the A10 which requires upgrading urgently to cope with the increased demand.

The railway station should be retained where it is until at least 2,500 houses the New Town are occupied - or BOTH stations should remain operational, the existing one could serve the existing village, Landbeach and the proposed boating lake.

Many in the existing village moved here because of the good public transport links. They should.not be fairly penalised by the proposals. The existing village should continue to have direct PT links to Cambridge, ideally with a P&R stop serving the new town and the existing village. Once the station is moved then a free shuttle bus should be provided to meet all services.

The new developments at the north of the village (Bannold Road and Cody Road) have shown how easy it is to lose valuable green spaces so the new developments should ensure households can access these easily and feel safe using them.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167365

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Shelley Mason

Representation Summary:

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS (FIXES)
SPATIAL FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM

Green spaces
The A10

Full text:

Summary
Overall number of dwellings
Pressure on existing village facilities during the initial phases of developments
Safeguarding transport in the existing village
Green spaces
The A10

Submission
While I understand the rationale for redeveloping the barracks area, I am not in favour of the adjoining area leading to the east. It is far from clear how the two developers will work together.

The Fenland nature of the area should be retained.

The Local Plan references 8-9 thousand units - so development should be contained within these limits.

What provision is there to ensure that existing village facilities already under severe pressure (roads, school intake, doctor's surgery) will cope before we trigger points on the new development are reached?

Access including construction traffic, should be off the A10 which requires upgrading urgently to cope with the increased demand.

The railway station should be retained where it is until at least 2,500 houses the New Town are occupied - or BOTH stations should remain operational, the existing one could serve the existing village, Landbeach and the proposed boating lake.

Many in the existing village moved here because of the good public transport links. They should.not be fairly penalised by the proposals. The existing village should continue to have direct PT links to Cambridge, ideally with a P&R stop serving the new town and the existing village. Once the station is moved then a free shuttle bus should be provided to meet all services.

The new developments at the north of the village (Bannold Road and Cody Road) have shown how easy it is to lose valuable green spaces so the new developments should ensure households can access these easily and feel safe using them.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167366

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr Ian Morgan

Representation Summary:

1. INTRODUCTION
I support Waterbeach Cycling Campaign's response to the SPD and their "People First" vision for the new town.

I have major concerns that the SPD will lead to a car centric development which prioitises space for cars over space for people. Main concerns are the primary roads being routed through the centre of the development, the proximity of schools to primary roads and development phasing. I have major concerns about the impact of the development on the village - the routing of traffic along Cody Road to the relocated train station and access to houses around the station. Waterbeach Cycling Campaign have presented an alternative vision for the new town - the "People First" vision.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167367

Received: 23/10/2018

Respondent: Sue Edwards

Representation Summary:

5.4 HEALTH
Objection: More health centre/GP provision should be in place at a very early stage of the development.

Full text:

1. The A10 should be fully upgraded before any development on the Barracks site commences.
2. More health centre/GP provision should be in place at a very early stage of the development.
3. The railway station should not be moved from its present site until the quantum of the new development is greater than that in Waterbeach village.
4. No construction traffic should be permitted to access the site through the village of Waterbeach

The site is currently earmarked for 8-9,000 properties although up to 11,000 could eventually be built. I object to this number because the A10 cannot possibly cope with the huge amount of traffic the development, in its construction stage and afterwards. It is already heavily congested and at peak times is at a standstill. No development should commence on the site until the A10 is properly upgraded. There is an estimate that 25,000 people will live on the new development yet it seems that only one GP surgery/health centre is mentioned. It is also envisaged that the existing health centre in Waterbeach copes with additional demand, from Section 106 contributions, during the early stages of the development. This health centre already is at full capacity. There is no mention of health care beyond that provided by the GP surgery. Addenbrooke's Hospital is frequently on black alert - how can it cope with this additional 25,000 people, plus those from other developments taking place in the county. I do not consider that the railway station should be moved from its present site until the quantum development of the new town is greater than that in Waterbeach village. Those people presently living in the village, especially at the southern end, would no longer be able to easily walk to the new station.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167368

Received: 23/10/2018

Respondent: Sue Edwards

Representation Summary:

6.2 INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN
Objection: More health centre/GP provision should be in place at a very early stage of the development.
Objection: The railway station should not be moved from its present site until the quantum of the new development is greater than that in Waterbeach village.

Full text:

1. The A10 should be fully upgraded before any development on the Barracks site commences.
2. More health centre/GP provision should be in place at a very early stage of the development.
3. The railway station should not be moved from its present site until the quantum of the new development is greater than that in Waterbeach village.
4. No construction traffic should be permitted to access the site through the village of Waterbeach

The site is currently earmarked for 8-9,000 properties although up to 11,000 could eventually be built. I object to this number because the A10 cannot possibly cope with the huge amount of traffic the development, in its construction stage and afterwards. It is already heavily congested and at peak times is at a standstill. No development should commence on the site until the A10 is properly upgraded. There is an estimate that 25,000 people will live on the new development yet it seems that only one GP surgery/health centre is mentioned. It is also envisaged that the existing health centre in Waterbeach copes with additional demand, from Section 106 contributions, during the early stages of the development. This health centre already is at full capacity. There is no mention of health care beyond that provided by the GP surgery. Addenbrooke's Hospital is frequently on black alert - how can it cope with this additional 25,000 people, plus those from other developments taking place in the county. I do not consider that the railway station should be moved from its present site until the quantum development of the new town is greater than that in Waterbeach village. Those people presently living in the village, especially at the southern end, would no longer be able to easily walk to the new station.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167369

Received: 23/10/2018

Respondent: Sue Edwards

Representation Summary:

APPENDIX 1: LOCAL POLICY CONTEXT
Objection: No construction traffic should be permitted to access the site through the village of Waterbeach

Full text:

1. The A10 should be fully upgraded before any development on the Barracks site commences.
2. More health centre/GP provision should be in place at a very early stage of the development.
3. The railway station should not be moved from its present site until the quantum of the new development is greater than that in Waterbeach village.
4. No construction traffic should be permitted to access the site through the village of Waterbeach

The site is currently earmarked for 8-9,000 properties although up to 11,000 could eventually be built. I object to this number because the A10 cannot possibly cope with the huge amount of traffic the development, in its construction stage and afterwards. It is already heavily congested and at peak times is at a standstill. No development should commence on the site until the A10 is properly upgraded. There is an estimate that 25,000 people will live on the new development yet it seems that only one GP surgery/health centre is mentioned. It is also envisaged that the existing health centre in Waterbeach copes with additional demand, from Section 106 contributions, during the early stages of the development. This health centre already is at full capacity. There is no mention of health care beyond that provided by the GP surgery. Addenbrooke's Hospital is frequently on black alert - how can it cope with this additional 25,000 people, plus those from other developments taking place in the county. I do not consider that the railway station should be moved from its present site until the quantum development of the new town is greater than that in Waterbeach village. Those people presently living in the village, especially at the southern end, would no longer be able to easily walk to the new station.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167370

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

1. INTRODUCTION
The SPD does not reflect the policies (main modifications) in the local plan which are a requirement to make the plan sound.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167371

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

1. INTRODUCTION
Question validity of consultation as it has been rushed through member process.

It is clear from minutes of meetings held by the scrutiny and overview committee in July, (timeline provided in my email dated 23rd October 2018 )that the SPD has been rushed through and that members have strong reservations including the fact that councillors had only five days to read and comment on the draft SPD. I therefore question the validity of this consultation. It appears that the public do not have detailed information or policies to make proper informed decisions.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167372

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

1. INTRODUCTION
SCDC's website that policies map work still needs to be completed to make the plan sound. Draft SPD page 8 quote "up to Sept 2018 prep SPD in accordance with Town and Country Planning res 2012" it does not refer to the adopted local plan which should inform the SPD.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167373

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

1.4 PROCESS AND PROGRAMME
Support the concerns of the Environment Agency, Natural England and Heritage England regarding SEA screening.

On page 8 the second action is to complete Strategic Environmental Assessment and Habitats Regulations Assessment Screenings to demonstrate how the SPD complies with EU Directives 2001/42/EC and 92/43/EEC. I fully support the concerns of the Environment Agency, Natural England and Heritage England and there are concerns that the proper environmental studies have not been completed and although outside the strategic site the Environment Agency's concerns about a huge sewage works in a level three flood zone area close to the banks of the river Cam. Pages 7 -9 of the link: http://scambs.moderngov.co.uk/documents/b50006250/Agenda%20supplement%20-
%20Update%20report%20for%20Waterbeach%20SPD%20Wednesday%2005-Sep-
2018%2009.30%20Cabinet.pdf?T=9

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167374

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

5.2 MOVEMENT AND PLACE
Support comments submitted by Waterbeach Cycle Campaign and the British Horse Society regarding access to green space on eastern edge of site.

I fully support the comments submitted by Waterbeach Cycle Campaign and the British Horse Association regarding connectivity and the right to enjoy designated public byways, footpaths and green space in the public realm on the rural Eastern edge of the New Town. I note that the SPD on the Eastern edge of the settlement refers to the fen edge looking out but not looking back into the site and how the proposed quantum and height of buildings especially the station quarter cannot be mitigated by planting because of the topography of the surrounding land.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167375

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

5.2 MOVEMENT AND PLACE
The local plan refers to a settlement of 8,000 - 9,000 dwellings and that it should reflect character of the surrounding fen-edge market towns. The Inspectors state that trees and water features should be retained. SC-MM057

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167376

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

6.5 MONITORING, REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION
Unclear from the SPD of when and how infrastructure will be delivered. Strategy should be in place now within the SPD. How will conditions/enforcement be monitored and managed due to SCDC's lack of resource? Should a financial viability SPD be completed to ensure the site is viable and sustainable?

Page 142 Viability and sustainability - Ref Inspector comments "It is unclear from the SPD of when and how infrastructure will be delivered. Cost of infrastructure particularly upgrade of the A10. Reliance on City Deal and s106 monies. SCDC local plan modelled viability on a settlement of 3,000 dwellings. The SPD is woolly with no clear sense of the financial implications of a settlement of 8,000 - 9,0000 dwellings. SC MM071 local plan 8. Page 142 Monitoring and review "the ability of collaborative working of the landowners, council and key stakeholders." Inspector stresses the importance of how the plan is monitored managed and reviewed. A strategy should be in place now within the SPD. Are SCDC able to complete these tasks? How will conditions/enforcement be monitored and managed due to SCDC's lack of resource? Will the cost of parcels of land be sold at an inflated price as the land comes with planning permission and could therefore affect the number of affordable homes? Should a financial viability SPD be completed to ensure the site is viable and sustainable?

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167377

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

6.7 DELIVERY OPTIONS
Section 106 agreements - needs more detail how managed, monitored and enforced.

SCDC officials and the district councillors have vocalised that the developers cannot be "forced to work together or give access to their respective lands" Without legally binding agreements there is the potential of the strategic site not being delivered as per the local plan and therefore not meeting the requirements of S CDC's local plan.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167378

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

5.6 SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE
Have studies need to be completed to ensure water levels are maintained at Wicken Fen and the Cam washes?

Page 101 5.6 Blue infrastructure Suds design - Because of the natural water content on the land, climate change and concreting over hectares of land (including in the main previously undeveloped land) have studies need to be completed to ensure water levels are maintained at Wicken Fen and the Cam washes?

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167379

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

2.8 Constraints and Opportunities
What extent of land mass of the proposed WNT land is contaminated particularly the barracks land site (see Inspectors notes) What will it cost to make safe and how might it affect the viability of the site?

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167380

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

5.8 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
What guarantees are there that there is a sufficient water supply. Have impacts on Cam Washes and Wicken fen been considered?

Page 108 32. Water stress quote "Waterbeach is located within an area of serious water stress" - what guarantees are there to enable a constant water supply for the new town and Waterbeach village. How will Wicken Fen and the Cam Washes be safeguarded? It is not acceptable that quote " a key priority for development will be to promote water efficiency" what guarantees and strategies will there be to ensure a constant supply of water for a population of 31,000 residents plus others (numbers unknown) accessing the site on a 24/7 basis? Will there be provision for hydrants for fire and rescue to access in case of emergency?

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167381

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

6.2 INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN
It is greatly concerning that such a huge settlement of a population the size of Ely and Newmarket combined has no plans for a police or fire station or places of worship.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167382

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

5.8 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Page 109 33. "temporary waste management what does how will it be accessed as the site develops. How will the waste be disposed of offsite?

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167383

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

6.5 MONITORING, REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION
How will construction traffic be monitored and managed throughout the construction phase to ensure that the communities in the parish of Waterbeach are not affected?

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167384

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

2.4 LANDSCAPE, ECOLOGY & WATER
I conclude Waterbeach New Town will have the combined populations of Ely and Newmarket. It sits of the edge of a fragile fenland landscape bordering Ancient Monuments including Denny Abbey to the North, Wicken Fen Ramsar site, site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), a component of Fenland Special Area of Conservation (SAC) (a European site), and the Cam Washes Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).Wicken Fen and the Cam Washes are co- dependent in supporting the wide biodiversity that they sustain.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167385

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Jane Williams

Representation Summary:

1. INTRODUCTION
Urge Land owners and developers to consider that profit does not come before people and place.

From the Inspectors report page 7 para 21 "The Plan proposes that development needs will be met at two new settlements at Waterbeach and Bourn Airfield. We have some concerns regarding the challenges of delivering new development at Waterbeach and Bourn, as set out below. However, there is no requirement for these sites to deliver housing in the early years of the plan period and consequently there will be an opportunity to review progress through the preparation of the joint local plan with Cambridge City Council, as required by the terms of the Greater Cambridge City Deal (see issue 17 below). I urge all who are responsible for the development of this site including the MOD & Urban & Civic, RLWE which includes local landowners, Royal London, Turnstone Estates and St John's College Cambridge that profit does not come before people and place. The responsibility is yours and yours alone. Some things cannot be bought.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167386

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Dr Lianne Parrett

Representation Summary:

1. INTRODUCTION

I have major concerns that the SPD will lead to a car centric development which prioitises space for cars over space for people. Main concerns are the primary roads being routed through the centre of the development, the proximity of schools to primary roads and development phasing. I have major concerns about the impact of the development on the village - the routing of traffic along Cody Road to the relocated train station and access to houses around the station. Waterbeach Cycling Campaign have presented an alternative vision for the new town - the "People First" vision.


Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167387

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Bearpark

Representation Summary:

1. INTRODUCTION
Support Waterbeach Cycling Campaign's response to the SPD and their "People First" vision for the new town.

Support

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167388

Received: 23/10/2018

Respondent: The National Trust

Representation Summary:

2.6 SURROUNDING CONTEXT
Support: Reference to the Wicken Fen Vision.

Full text:

Please refer to uploaded document.

2.3 ACCESS, MOVEMENT AND CONNECTIVITY
Comment: Comprehensive sustainable movement framework and a potential connection to Cycle Route 11 shown in Figure 6 is noted.

2.6 SURROUNDING CONTEXT
Support: Reference to the Wicken Fen Vision.
Objection: Opportunities have been missed to look beyond the immediate site boundaries and to integrate the site
effectively with the surrounding countryside. The site also has a relationship to rural parts of East Cambridgeshire, located to the
north east of the development.

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
Support: Broadly support the proposed approach to Structuring Elements and Guiding Principles.

4.2.3 PRIMARY MOVEMENT ACCESS
Objection: Primary movement and Access: The proposals for cycling and pedestrian movement omit reference to:
- pedestrian and cycle links the north to the north and east, including the Fen Rivers Way;
- and Lodes Way (National Cycle Route 11).
Support: Inclusion of the 'missing link', which would connect Waterbeach to Wicken. The Trust is supportive of this scheme subject to being satisfied that measures are in place to protect ecologically sensitive parts of the Wicken Fen reserve.

4.2.6 PUBLIC SPACES
Support: Green infrastructure; delivery of high quality multifunctional green spaces and wider connectivity.

4.2.10 EDGE TREATMENTS
Comment: Principle 7 Greenways and Corridors should consider specific enhancement opportunities, and articulate a long term vision for enhancing the Fen Edge and Rail corridor.

5.5 GUIDING PRINCIPLES - 20 Create a multifunctional Green Network
Objection: Commitment needed in SPD to this Guiding Principle otherwise SPD is not fully compliant with Local Plan Policy NH4 in terms of aiding the delivery of the Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy.

6.2 INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN
Comment: The SPD should endorse the use of the Natural Cambridgeshire Local Nature Partnership's (LNP) Developing with Nature Toolkit in the design and delivery of multi-functional habitats at Waterbeach.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167389

Received: 23/10/2018

Respondent: The National Trust

Representation Summary:

2.6 SURROUNDING CONTEXT
Objection: Opportunities have been missed to look beyond the immediate site boundaries and to integrate the site effectively with the surrounding countryside. The site also has a relationship to rural parts of East Cambridgeshire, located to the
north east of the development.

Full text:

Please refer to uploaded document.

2.3 ACCESS, MOVEMENT AND CONNECTIVITY
Comment: Comprehensive sustainable movement framework and a potential connection to Cycle Route 11 shown in Figure 6 is noted.

2.6 SURROUNDING CONTEXT
Support: Reference to the Wicken Fen Vision.
Objection: Opportunities have been missed to look beyond the immediate site boundaries and to integrate the site
effectively with the surrounding countryside. The site also has a relationship to rural parts of East Cambridgeshire, located to the
north east of the development.

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
Support: Broadly support the proposed approach to Structuring Elements and Guiding Principles.

4.2.3 PRIMARY MOVEMENT ACCESS
Objection: Primary movement and Access: The proposals for cycling and pedestrian movement omit reference to:
- pedestrian and cycle links the north to the north and east, including the Fen Rivers Way;
- and Lodes Way (National Cycle Route 11).
Support: Inclusion of the 'missing link', which would connect Waterbeach to Wicken. The Trust is supportive of this scheme subject to being satisfied that measures are in place to protect ecologically sensitive parts of the Wicken Fen reserve.

4.2.6 PUBLIC SPACES
Support: Green infrastructure; delivery of high quality multifunctional green spaces and wider connectivity.

4.2.10 EDGE TREATMENTS
Comment: Principle 7 Greenways and Corridors should consider specific enhancement opportunities, and articulate a long term vision for enhancing the Fen Edge and Rail corridor.

5.5 GUIDING PRINCIPLES - 20 Create a multifunctional Green Network
Objection: Commitment needed in SPD to this Guiding Principle otherwise SPD is not fully compliant with Local Plan Policy NH4 in terms of aiding the delivery of the Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy.

6.2 INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN
Comment: The SPD should endorse the use of the Natural Cambridgeshire Local Nature Partnership's (LNP) Developing with Nature Toolkit in the design and delivery of multi-functional habitats at Waterbeach.

Support

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167390

Received: 23/10/2018

Respondent: The National Trust

Representation Summary:

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS (FIXES)
Support: Broadly support the proposed approach to Structuring Elements and Guiding Principles.

Full text:

Please refer to uploaded document.

2.3 ACCESS, MOVEMENT AND CONNECTIVITY
Comment: Comprehensive sustainable movement framework and a potential connection to Cycle Route 11 shown in Figure 6 is noted.

2.6 SURROUNDING CONTEXT
Support: Reference to the Wicken Fen Vision.
Objection: Opportunities have been missed to look beyond the immediate site boundaries and to integrate the site
effectively with the surrounding countryside. The site also has a relationship to rural parts of East Cambridgeshire, located to the
north east of the development.

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
Support: Broadly support the proposed approach to Structuring Elements and Guiding Principles.

4.2.3 PRIMARY MOVEMENT ACCESS
Objection: Primary movement and Access: The proposals for cycling and pedestrian movement omit reference to:
- pedestrian and cycle links the north to the north and east, including the Fen Rivers Way;
- and Lodes Way (National Cycle Route 11).
Support: Inclusion of the 'missing link', which would connect Waterbeach to Wicken. The Trust is supportive of this scheme subject to being satisfied that measures are in place to protect ecologically sensitive parts of the Wicken Fen reserve.

4.2.6 PUBLIC SPACES
Support: Green infrastructure; delivery of high quality multifunctional green spaces and wider connectivity.

4.2.10 EDGE TREATMENTS
Comment: Principle 7 Greenways and Corridors should consider specific enhancement opportunities, and articulate a long term vision for enhancing the Fen Edge and Rail corridor.

5.5 GUIDING PRINCIPLES - 20 Create a multifunctional Green Network
Objection: Commitment needed in SPD to this Guiding Principle otherwise SPD is not fully compliant with Local Plan Policy NH4 in terms of aiding the delivery of the Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy.

6.2 INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN
Comment: The SPD should endorse the use of the Natural Cambridgeshire Local Nature Partnership's (LNP) Developing with Nature Toolkit in the design and delivery of multi-functional habitats at Waterbeach.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167391

Received: 23/10/2018

Respondent: The National Trust

Representation Summary:

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS (FIXES)
PRIMARY MOVEMENT AND ACCESS
Objection: Primary movement and Access: The proposals for cycling and pedestrian movement omit reference to:
- pedestrian and cycle links the north to the north and east, including the Fen Rivers Way;
- and Lodes Way (National Cycle Route 11).

Full text:

Please refer to uploaded document.

2.3 ACCESS, MOVEMENT AND CONNECTIVITY
Comment: Comprehensive sustainable movement framework and a potential connection to Cycle Route 11 shown in Figure 6 is noted.

2.6 SURROUNDING CONTEXT
Support: Reference to the Wicken Fen Vision.
Objection: Opportunities have been missed to look beyond the immediate site boundaries and to integrate the site
effectively with the surrounding countryside. The site also has a relationship to rural parts of East Cambridgeshire, located to the
north east of the development.

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
Support: Broadly support the proposed approach to Structuring Elements and Guiding Principles.

4.2.3 PRIMARY MOVEMENT ACCESS
Objection: Primary movement and Access: The proposals for cycling and pedestrian movement omit reference to:
- pedestrian and cycle links the north to the north and east, including the Fen Rivers Way;
- and Lodes Way (National Cycle Route 11).
Support: Inclusion of the 'missing link', which would connect Waterbeach to Wicken. The Trust is supportive of this scheme subject to being satisfied that measures are in place to protect ecologically sensitive parts of the Wicken Fen reserve.

4.2.6 PUBLIC SPACES
Support: Green infrastructure; delivery of high quality multifunctional green spaces and wider connectivity.

4.2.10 EDGE TREATMENTS
Comment: Principle 7 Greenways and Corridors should consider specific enhancement opportunities, and articulate a long term vision for enhancing the Fen Edge and Rail corridor.

5.5 GUIDING PRINCIPLES - 20 Create a multifunctional Green Network
Objection: Commitment needed in SPD to this Guiding Principle otherwise SPD is not fully compliant with Local Plan Policy NH4 in terms of aiding the delivery of the Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy.

6.2 INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN
Comment: The SPD should endorse the use of the Natural Cambridgeshire Local Nature Partnership's (LNP) Developing with Nature Toolkit in the design and delivery of multi-functional habitats at Waterbeach.

Object

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167392

Received: 26/10/2018

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Bearpark

Representation Summary:

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS (FIXES)
Need to consider arts and an arts venue.

Whilst 'Arts and Culture facilities' are referenced, these are in passing and entirely vague (SPD pp39-40). The Creative Industries, which include the arts, are of growing importance in the UK economy and can play an important part in helping to create vibrant and cohesive communities.
Waterbeach has a lively arts community, which Urban and Civic has supported in recent years by hosting Open Studios at the Barracks site. It is hugely important that the plan for the New Town includes a dedicated venue for the arts to include live events, concerts and theatre as well as dedicated exhibition space. The plan should also consider how to embed the arts throughout the town through commissioned works and events that interpret the site and its fenland setting. Fen Edge communities are ill-served by the arts and there is opportunity here to change that model for the better.

Support

Waterbeach New Town Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 167393

Received: 23/10/2018

Respondent: The National Trust

Representation Summary:

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS (FIXES)
PRIMARY MOVEMENT AND ACCESS
Support: Inclusion of the 'missing link', which would connect Waterbeach to Wicken. The Trust is supportive of this scheme subject to being satisfied that measures are in place to protect ecologically sensitive parts of the Wicken Fen reserve.

Full text:

Please refer to uploaded document.

2.3 ACCESS, MOVEMENT AND CONNECTIVITY
Comment: Comprehensive sustainable movement framework and a potential connection to Cycle Route 11 shown in Figure 6 is noted.

2.6 SURROUNDING CONTEXT
Support: Reference to the Wicken Fen Vision.
Objection: Opportunities have been missed to look beyond the immediate site boundaries and to integrate the site
effectively with the surrounding countryside. The site also has a relationship to rural parts of East Cambridgeshire, located to the
north east of the development.

4.2 KEY STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
Support: Broadly support the proposed approach to Structuring Elements and Guiding Principles.

4.2.3 PRIMARY MOVEMENT ACCESS
Objection: Primary movement and Access: The proposals for cycling and pedestrian movement omit reference to:
- pedestrian and cycle links the north to the north and east, including the Fen Rivers Way;
- and Lodes Way (National Cycle Route 11).
Support: Inclusion of the 'missing link', which would connect Waterbeach to Wicken. The Trust is supportive of this scheme subject to being satisfied that measures are in place to protect ecologically sensitive parts of the Wicken Fen reserve.

4.2.6 PUBLIC SPACES
Support: Green infrastructure; delivery of high quality multifunctional green spaces and wider connectivity.

4.2.10 EDGE TREATMENTS
Comment: Principle 7 Greenways and Corridors should consider specific enhancement opportunities, and articulate a long term vision for enhancing the Fen Edge and Rail corridor.

5.5 GUIDING PRINCIPLES - 20 Create a multifunctional Green Network
Objection: Commitment needed in SPD to this Guiding Principle otherwise SPD is not fully compliant with Local Plan Policy NH4 in terms of aiding the delivery of the Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy.

6.2 INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN
Comment: The SPD should endorse the use of the Natural Cambridgeshire Local Nature Partnership's (LNP) Developing with Nature Toolkit in the design and delivery of multi-functional habitats at Waterbeach.